Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? ``
kenney_at_cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: starlord: "Re: San Francisco Amateur"
- Previous message: Tom Davis: "Re: so called new approach to design doublet APOs. ;>)"
- In reply to: hanson: "Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? ``"
- Next in thread: Tom Potter: "Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? ``"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
In article <19Ynd.206$NU3.141@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
hanson@quick.net (hanson) wrote:
> all these "works of art" were stolen, confiscated or
> made by slave labor in the name of religion,
No European Cathedral was stolen, confiscated (exception British
cathedrals were confiscated by the Crown), or built by slave labour.
Most if not all were financed by voluntary contributions which is one
reason for the building time.
Ken Young
kenney@cix.co.uk
Maternity is a matter of fact
Paternity is a matter of opinion
- Next message: starlord: "Re: San Francisco Amateur"
- Previous message: Tom Davis: "Re: so called new approach to design doublet APOs. ;>)"
- In reply to: hanson: "Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? ``"
- Next in thread: Tom Potter: "Re: Why *TEN* Commandments? ``"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
