Re: Orion 4.5" opinions
From: Rod Mollise (rmollise_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: What to do with a cold scope and EP's?"
- Previous message: Rod Mollise: "Re: Orion SkyQuest 4.5 viewing question"
- In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Next in thread: SaberScorpX: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Reply: SaberScorpX: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Reply: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Nov 2004 22:26:15 GMT
>
>F4 will be much more difficult to collimate and will have much more coma.
>The
>steep angle of the an F4 light cone will also cause serious aberrations in
>most
>eyepieces..
>
Hi Jon:
And yet...and yet...
The StarBlast does a remarkably good job, even on the Moon and planets, wiping
the floor with my poor 80 f/5. And it features that spectacularly wide field.
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers!
Goto <http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html>
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: What to do with a cold scope and EP's?"
- Previous message: Rod Mollise: "Re: Orion SkyQuest 4.5 viewing question"
- In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Next in thread: SaberScorpX: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Reply: SaberScorpX: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Reply: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Orion 4.5" opinions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
