Re: Diffraction rings
From: Brian Tung (brian_at_isi.edu)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Stephen Paul: "Re: GPC-102ED by Vixen"
- Previous message: OG: "Re: Atheists & Skeptics are absolutely dead-wrong about `"
- In reply to: Dan Chaffee: "Re: Diffraction rings"
- Next in thread: CLT: "Re: Diffraction rings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Dan Chaffee wrote:
> Actually, the rille in the Alpine Valley is not high contrast
Fair enough, but it's still a problematic example because it's a linear
object. Perhaps a better test is splitting the double craterlet in Plato,
or seeing the fork of Sinus Meridiani on Mars, even when it's far away.
(It's probably a bit too far right now, with an apparent size of about
4 arcseconds or so.)
> I meant on one side of the image of the disk, not either side of
> focus.
> \
> \ \
> o | | |
> / /
> /
Oops, OK, my bad.
Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
- Next message: Stephen Paul: "Re: GPC-102ED by Vixen"
- Previous message: OG: "Re: Atheists & Skeptics are absolutely dead-wrong about `"
- In reply to: Dan Chaffee: "Re: Diffraction rings"
- Next in thread: CLT: "Re: Diffraction rings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]