Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam
From: Martin Frey (martinfrey_at_snipclara.co.uk)
Date: 12/07/04
- Next message: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Previous message: Joe S.: "Re: Bob Dylan"
- In reply to: Rod Mollise: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Next in thread: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Reply: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:11:05 +0000
rmollise@aol.com (Rod Mollise) wrote:
>If you just want to image the planets, go the webcam route. I'm convinced
>nothing will beat 'em (when combined with Registax) for planetary detail. I've
>found that you really start getting the details _down_ on Jupiter, for example,
>after about 300 stacked frames. You probably will not be able to take 300
>frames with a DSLR in the 90 seconds or so required to prevent smearing due to
>planetary rotation. Also, the small pixels of the webcams are very well suited
>to high res imaging.
>
>If you also want to shoot the deep sky, and maybe terrestrial images, get the
>DSLR.
Expand the thread - where do the dedicated ccds - SBIGs and Starlights
- fit in with this analysis?
-----------------------------
Martin Frey
http://www.hadastro.org.uk
N 51 01 52.2 E 0 47 21.1
-----------------------------
- Next message: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Previous message: Joe S.: "Re: Bob Dylan"
- In reply to: Rod Mollise: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Next in thread: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Reply: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Digital reflex vs Webcam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|