Re: BEWARE: GOOGLES CENSORSHIP: BEWARE (of censorship!)

From: hanson (hanson_at_quick.net)
Date: 12/12/04 

Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:21:46 GMT

AHAHAHA....ahahahaha...... this is a good one. This is what
makes the usenet so preciously fucking hilarious.....ahahaha

"Anonymous" <nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid> wrote in message
news:D7O20TX338332.9898032407@anonymous.poster...

[hanson]
"Anonymous" must be a VERY important person not being
willing to risk his career... but then on the other hand he
may be the daddy of some teenagers who would be laughing
their ass off or being driven into adolescent depression when
they read their dad's mental masturbations on the net... ahaha..
or... our Cyber reverend DJ Min uses it to get renewed attention.

.
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, "deniALEXcuses" <alexcuster@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >Let me ask this: Were you to use a different news-reader, would you still
> >experience that censorship?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Yes, as it has nothing to do with the newsreader or platform, but
> is specifically about preserving public access to a VERY important
> ever-burgeoning historical and technological document called the

[hanson]
DJ, besides your gems, there are NO other "historical and technological
documents" in the NG archives. Not a single one, reverend! ... AHAHAHA
Only complete, totally gone losers would think otherwise..... ahahahaha.

> usenet newsgroup archives, which first archived newsgroup articles
> date back to 1981 when there were only about 150 computers on the
> network. Google's new "beta" is making uncensored public access to
> archived-messages on the archives impossible. See for yourself...
>

[hanson]
Now, I can see why you need total access to these archives because
that's where you get your ideas and wisdom from, huh? ... and to
see who else stole your vast intellectual property. I can feel for you.
But you can't blame google. They footed the bill for archiving. Soon you
will have to pay them money to get access. That's the breaks, DJ.

> There's NOTHING like the power of the demonstration. For example,
> I can still link to my complete untruncated messages using Google's
> foreign domain servers. And because I saved EVERY article and reply
> that I've ever posted since March 1998 locally on my hard disks and
> eventually backed them all up to CDs, I can go back and locate EVERY
> message ID for EVERY message I've ever posted easily and quickly.
>

[hanson]
I like people who take thensleves so serious. They are a very rich source
for laughter. A great fountain of fun. ........ AHAHAHAHA.........

> Back on October 8, 2001, I posted the first edition of my interlinear
> translation of Nostradamus' Epistle Toward King Henry II of France on
> message ID <8b43d3e8c100d8a88968a8c285373de2@mixmaster.nullify.org>,
> then on May 5, 2003 I posted my translation of the Preface on message
> ID <ZO0GBVCE37747.1379513889@Gilgamesh-frog.org>. Compare Google's
> "beta" with the old-style Google by using UK's server from outside
> the UK (I'm in Colorado, USA) to access the two aforecited articles:
>
>
http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm=8b43d3e8c100d8a88968a8c285373de2@mixmaster.nullify.org
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8b43d3e8c100d8a88968a8c285373de2@mixmaster.nullify.org
>
>
http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm=ZO0GBVCE37747.1379513889@Gilgamesh-frog.org
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=ZO0GBVCE37747.1379513889@Gilgamesh-frog.org
>
> If you use PGP, you can check the autograph authenticity of these
> "www.google.co.uk" accessed articles by importing my public PGP key,
> highlight the whole page, then check the messages' validity, usually
> by pressing "Ctrl+D". You see that these are my original articles:
>
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
> (my PGP public key also appears at the bottom of the 'Epistle' page)
>
> Notice how both articles appear complete and untruncated through
> the UK server, and that both return "good" PGP signature status
> from yours truly.
>
> By STARK contrast, notice how the "beta" accessed articles have been
> mysteriously truncated. And if THIS isn't draconian censorship of the
> archives then every English dictionary in every library on the planet
> belongs in the trash can! And, Google's un-American censorship of the
> archives gets worse than this. Try pulling up my message that you've
> just responded to in this thread:
>
> http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm=VE8V0M8438332.2217708333@reece.net.au
>
> Notice how the link at the bottom of the UK-accessed articles isn't
> hyperlinked like it should be. That's because the UK has implemented
> their "beta" against folks in the UK who are trying to access Google
> Groups' search engine--just like they've done to those of us in the
> USA who're trying to access Google's US-doman server here in the US.
>
> Now, highlight all the text on the UK-accessed page and check my PGP
> signature, "good" it shows. Compare the same article in the US-domain:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VE8V0M8438332.2217708333@reece.net.au
>
> Click "show options" and click "show original", then highlight the
> page and check my PGP signature, and it improperly shows "bad", as
> the previous test of the very same article accessed through the UK
> server irrefutably proves. More importantly, notice how the message
> ID "XJBDEJF138262.9022453...@anonymous.poster" has been inexplicably
> truncated and rendered totally dysfunctional and ALSO unsearchable!
>
> Because I've been very careful to save ALL of my newsgroup articles
> and back them up to presently about 100 CD's (along with all seven
> of my PDF-formatted books), and placed them in the hands of family,
> friends and associates, I'm not so concerned that my own articles
> are no longer viably searchable on Google. But there are MILLIONS
> upon MILLIONS of articles which have been posted to the usenet and
> *continue* to be posted across tens of thousands of groups from all
> over the free world! Google is now effectively censoring the ENTIRE
> archive, and is implementing their so-called "beta" ALL around the
> world! So, if nobody else out there in usenet-land could care less
> if Google simply deletes and destroys the ENTIRE archive, then let
> them do just that. If the world is that apathetic to history and the
> development of usenet technology, then they deserve to have all of
> the newsgroup archives completely destroyed and erased from memory.
>
> I'm quite pleased, actually, since I'm sure that my newsgroup posts
> had no small part in Google's decision to censor all of the archives.
> Let 'em destroy it for all I care. The DAMAGE has already been done
> to the liberal terrorists, and SOON they are going to be running to
> save their filthy miserable Anti-Xian Anti-American hides--but to no
> avail: Liberal terrorism a.k.a. Anti-Xianism is **DEAD and BURIED**!
>
> Merry Christmas!
> Daniel Joseph Min
> http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
> http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> iQA/AwUBQbvN7pljD7YrHM/nEQLukwCfXzzzQREycIA/ltLhzWJGxufBuGcAnjTU
> RUK0TC1xlzW2Q1wKPazPEg8X
> =OSlk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Well, like I said, DJ, them is the breaks. But I wish you a very "MERRY
CHRISTMAS" anyway despite that "Liberal terrorism aka Anti-Xianism"
that wants you to say "Happy Holydays". OTOH it is still uncontested
to wish everybody a "Happy Hanukkah". Maybe you should convert
from being a reverend and become an ersatz rabbi, like Bob Kolker,
then all your problems would be gone. Thanks for all the laughs, dude.
ahahaha......ahahanson

Quantcast