Re: web cam
From: Chris L Peterson (clp_at_alumni.caltech.edu)
Date: 12/26/04
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Slimy Yahoo at it again"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Google's Censorship Has Bloggers Working Overtime"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: web cam"
- Next in thread: Rod Mollise: "Re: web cam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:18:04 GMT
On 26 Dec 2004 12:31:22 -0800, "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote:
>Please correct me if I'm wrong (my technology may be dated), but most
>webcams or even the DSI are short range-limited by having USB
>connections. He would need an Ethernet (or better yet wireless) cam to
>be able to connect from more than 20 feet away.
Most people just put a computer at the scope and control it using Remote Desktop
or some third-party remote control app. A USB extender is another option. So far
(unfortunately) the webcams that work well for astronomy are not Ethernet.
>Also, it would be
>helpful to have some way to aim the scope remotely too...
Also trivial as long as the scope is a goto.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Slimy Yahoo at it again"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Google's Censorship Has Bloggers Working Overtime"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: web cam"
- Next in thread: Rod Mollise: "Re: web cam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|