sci.astro.amateur
By Thread

5303 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• Iraq's Election Victory! Nomen Nescio (01/31/05)
• Astronomy Crossword Puzzle Rolf Carstens (01/31/05)
• Portable Observatory Too_Many_Tools (01/31/05)
  • Re: Portable Observatory Ed T (01/31/05)
• Machholz in IC 1848 images? Florian (01/31/05)
• Observing report, TV76, 1/29/05 Florian (01/31/05)
• Observing report, TV76, 1/27/05 Florian (01/31/05)
• Re: Let Hubble die gracef JOHN PAZMINO (01/31/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracef levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/31/05)
• Re: AOL response to usene JOHN PAZMINO (01/31/05)
• amateur color pic - methane in Titan's atmosphere ? Maurice Gavin (01/30/05)
• Speed of Quantum information flow barney (01/30/05)
  • Re: Speed of Quantum information flow Tim Killian (01/30/05)
  • Re: Speed of Quantum information flow linus_das_at_yahoo.co.uk (01/31/05)
• ...but a Digital Astrophotographer's Work is Never Done Davoud (01/30/05)
  • Re: ...but a Digital Astrophotographer's Work is Never Done Dave Jessie (01/31/05)
• SCT Collimation Rank Amateur (01/30/05)
  • Re: SCT Collimation tedkord_at_excite.com (01/30/05)
    • Re: SCT Collimation JJK (01/31/05)
• Pay for time Internet base Telescopes? themeanies (01/30/05)
  • Re: Pay for time Internet base Telescopes? Florian (01/30/05)
  • Re: Pay for time Internet base Telescopes? SPAMtrap_at_Starry-Nite.net (01/31/05)
• Problems with posts appearing Martin R. Howell (01/30/05)
  • Re: Problems with posts appearing Bert Hyman (01/30/05)
    • Re: Problems with posts appearing Bill Becker (01/30/05)
    • Re: Problems with posts appearing StarzisMe_at_netscape.net (01/31/05)
  • Re: Problems with posts appearing Howard Lester (01/30/05)
    • Re: Problems with posts appearing Ed T (01/31/05)
    • Re: Problems with posts appearing Jan Owen (01/31/05)
• Mimas cameo sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
• Re: Q_=B7_=B7_Have_You_Heard_The_?= Good News? · · · (SPAM) Dan Wenz (01/30/05)
• Question about Toucam cameras, 1/4" or 1/3" ? Nostromo (01/30/05)
  • Re: Question about Toucam cameras, 1/4" or 1/3" ? Roger Hamlett (01/30/05)
    • Re: Question about Toucam cameras, 1/4" or 1/3" ? Nostromo (01/30/05)
      • Re: Question about Toucam cameras, 1/4" or 1/3" ? Nostromo (01/30/05)
• 'static' sun via clockwork driven Coronado PST Maurice Gavin (01/30/05)
  • Re: 'static' sun via clockwork driven Coronado PST JATO (01/30/05)
• OT - The World Wrestling Federation addresses global warming! Tim Killian (01/30/05)
  • Re: OT - The World Wrestling Federation addresses global warming! Bob Schmall (01/30/05)
    • Re: OT - The World Wrestling Federation addresses global warming! Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: OT - The World Wrestling Federation addresses global warming! Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: OT - The World Wrestling Federation addresses global warming! Mark (01/30/05)
• Re: · · · Have You Heard The Good News? · · · chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/30/05)
  • Re: · · · Have You Heard The Good News? · · · Florian (01/31/05)
• 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster Dr. Stupid (01/30/05)
  • Re: 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster Phil (01/30/05)
    • Re: 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/30/05)
      • Re: 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster Gaz (01/30/05)
  • Re: 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster HAVRILIAK (01/30/05)
  • Re: 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster CHASLX200 (01/30/05)
    • Re: 60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster James Vincent (01/30/05)
• Hubble missed Dorado mini-star sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/30/05)
• I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Davoud (01/30/05)
  • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Florian (01/30/05)
  • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") T.T. (01/30/05)
  • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Brian Tung (01/30/05)
    • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Brian Tung (01/30/05)
      • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Ed T (01/30/05)
  • Re: I Will Become a TV Evangelist (Was: "Sam Wormley is Wrong...") Mark (01/30/05)
• Anyone "registax" the Titan images? RichA (01/30/05)
• Toronto seeing conditions RichA (01/30/05)
  • Re: Toronto seeing conditions Amyotte (01/30/05)
  • Re: Toronto seeing conditions Davoud (01/30/05)
  • Re: Toronto seeing conditions Jason Macadamia (01/30/05)
  • Re: Toronto seeing conditions CLT (01/30/05)
• Old Tele Vue Widefields jscottb_at_bonbon.net (01/29/05)
  • Re: Old Tele Vue Widefields RichA (01/30/05)
  • Re: Old Tele Vue Widefields Mike (01/30/05)
• Computers Ed Majden (01/29/05)
  • Re: Computers David Nakamoto (01/29/05)
  • Re: Computers Sam Wormley (01/29/05)
    • Re: Computers Len Philpot (01/30/05)
  • Re: Computers Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
    • Re: Computers Gaz (01/29/05)
    • Re: Computers Ed Majden (01/30/05)
      • Re: Computers Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
  • Re: Computers RichA (01/30/05)
    • Re: Computers Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Computers Tim Auton (01/31/05)
  • Re: Computers Hilton Evans (01/30/05)
  • Re: Computers Matthew Ota (01/30/05)
• TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Szaki (01/29/05)
  • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Tim Killian (01/29/05)
  • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED RichA (01/30/05)
    • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED clydec_at_nyc.rr.com (01/30/05)
      • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Ed T (01/30/05)
      • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED David Nakamoto (01/30/05)
    • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Szaki (01/30/05)
    • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Too_Many_Tools (01/30/05)
      • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Steve Maddison (01/30/05)
  • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Lucy (01/30/05)
    • Re: TV85 vs. Orion 80ED Szaki (01/30/05)
• RAW capturing for Logitech Quickcam 4000 Dimitri (01/29/05)
  • Re: RAW capturing for Logitech Quickcam 4000 Bob May (01/30/05)
• Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Davoud (01/29/05)
  • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Al Arduengo (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Straw Day (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Richard DeLuca (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Lucy (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Richard DeLuca (01/30/05)
  • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Tim Killian (01/29/05)
  • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Gareth Slee (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Davoud (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Gareth Slee (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) John Shakespeare (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Randy L. (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) William Foley (01/30/05)
  • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Steve Taylor (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
  • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/29/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Ioannis (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Ioannis (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Ioannis (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Tim Killian (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Florian (01/29/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Ed T (01/30/05)
    • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) allisonki_at_IGNmail.com (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Florian (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Ioannis (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Al Arduengo (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Florian (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Richard DeLuca (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Chris L Peterson (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Richard DeLuca (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Chris L Peterson (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Richard DeLuca (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Brian Tung (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Davoud (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Davoud (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Al Arduengo (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Mark (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong Scott M. Kozel (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott Believer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott Believer (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Florian (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott Believer (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Shawn (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Shawn (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Scott M. Kozel (01/31/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Sam Wormley (01/30/05)
      • Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...) Tim Auton (01/30/05)
• 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Gaz (01/29/05)
  • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Szaki (01/29/05)
    • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Richard Carlson (01/30/05)
  • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Tim Killian (01/29/05)
    • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Gaz (01/29/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Tim Killian (01/29/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? JJK (01/31/05)
  • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? David Nakamoto (01/29/05)
    • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Szaki (01/29/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? David Nakamoto (01/29/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Szaki (01/29/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? David Nakamoto (01/30/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Szaki (01/30/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? David Nakamoto (01/30/05)
      • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Szaki (01/30/05)
  • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? JJK (01/31/05)
    • Re: 127mm Mak-Cas or Orion 80ED? Gaz (01/31/05)
• Panoramic display of moon photos and talk (UK) Paul (01/29/05)
• High Dec Bright Variables Zinc Potterman (01/29/05)
  • Re: High Dec Bright Variables gubbenimanen (01/30/05)
• It's a good question Iceman-Jamie (01/29/05)
  • Re: It's a good question Gareth Slee (01/29/05)
  • Re: It's a good question HAVRILIAK (01/29/05)
    • Re: It's a good question Steve Maddison (01/30/05)
      • Re: It's a good question Tom Randy (01/30/05)
  • Re: It's a good question Tom Randy (01/29/05)
    • Re: It's a good question Wayne Howell (01/29/05)
      • Re: It's a good question Gareth Slee (01/29/05)
      • Re: It's a good question T.T. (01/30/05)
• Re: Roller bearings on a Dob Uncle Bob (01/29/05)
• Is 8 mm eye relief a problem? ROM SPACE KNIGHT NURSE (01/29/05)
  • Re: Is 8 mm eye relief a problem? starlord (01/29/05)
  • Re: Is 8 mm eye relief a problem? SaberScorpX (01/29/05)
    • Re: Is 8 mm eye relief a problem? SaberScorpX (01/29/05)
• Astrophotography: Building Confidence Davoud (01/29/05)
  • Re: Astrophotography: Building Confidence RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
  • Re: Astrophotography: Building Confidence starburst (01/29/05)
• Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Jan 28 Stuart Goldman (01/29/05)
• Re: (",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users Florian (01/29/05)
  • Re: (",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/29/05)
  • Re: (",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users Jochen Lueg (01/29/05)
    • Re: (",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users Florian (01/29/05)
  • Re: (",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users Richard F.L.R. Snashall (01/29/05)
  • Re: (",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users Bkiff (01/30/05)
• New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Peter [astro.mp] (01/29/05)
  • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? AFM_at_andersonsoftware.ca (01/29/05)
  • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
    • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Too_Many_Tools (01/29/05)
    • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Peter [astro.mp] (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Michael McCulloch (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Impact9 (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Michael McCulloch (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Michael McCulloch (01/30/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? FloridaRadio (01/30/05)
• Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Stephen Paul (01/31/05)
• Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
  • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Roger Hamlett (01/29/05)
    • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/30/05)
• Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
  • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? matt (01/29/05)
    • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Tim Auton (01/30/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Chris L Peterson (01/30/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Tim Auton (01/31/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Peter [astro.mp] (01/30/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Tim Auton (01/31/05)
      • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Chris L Peterson (01/31/05)
  • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? mario_884_at_hotmail.com (01/30/05)
    • Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RMOLLISE (01/30/05)
• Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Banjo (01/29/05)
• Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? RichA (01/30/05)
• Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing? Steve Maddison (01/30/05)
• background subtraction HAVRILIAK (01/29/05)
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Jan 05 Washington, DC Sam Wormley (01/28/05)
• Red Shift 5 Jerry Pool (01/28/05)
  • Re: Red Shift 5 RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
• Best camera for moon pictures? Doink (01/28/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? David Nakamoto (01/28/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? laura halliday (01/28/05)
    • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Doink (01/28/05)
      • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? laura halliday (01/29/05)
      • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Doink (01/31/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Chris L Peterson (01/28/05)
    • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Larry Stedman (01/29/05)
      • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Carsten A. Arnholm (01/28/05)
    • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Anthony Ayiomamitis (01/29/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Jason Macadamia (01/29/05)
    • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Doink (01/29/05)
      • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Jason Macadamia (01/29/05)
      • Jason! Doink (01/29/05)
      • Re: Jason! Jason Macadamia (01/29/05)
      • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? WA2GUF_at_netscape.net (01/29/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? JATO (01/29/05)
    • JATO!!!! Doink (01/29/05)
  • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
    • Re: Best camera for moon pictures? Doink (01/29/05)
• Re: (",) Hello, I Have Good News! moabrat (01/28/05)
  • Re: (",) Hello, I Have Good News! Uncle Bob (01/28/05)
  • Re: (",) Hello, I Have Good News! MitchAlsup_at_aol.com (01/28/05)
• Background subtraction kit HAVRILIAK (01/28/05)
  • Re: Background subtraction kit Cougar (01/28/05)
  • Re: Background subtraction kit canopus56 (01/28/05)
  • Re: Background subtraction kit Chris L Peterson (01/29/05)
    • Re: Background subtraction kit HAVRILIAK (01/29/05)
  • Re: Background subtraction kit [gradations] Ralph Hertle (01/29/05)
    • Re: Background subtraction kit [gradations] HAVRILIAK (01/29/05)
• New ATM website Beri (01/28/05)
  • Re: New ATM website Mack C. Farrington (01/29/05)
• Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? dylan (01/28/05)
  • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? Steve - www.ukspeedtraps.co.uk (01/28/05)
    • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? Roger Hamlett (01/28/05)
      • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? Steve - www.ukspeedtraps.co.uk (01/28/05)
      • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? Don (01/29/05)
      • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? Too_Many_Tools (01/29/05)
      • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series or CPC !? Roger Hamlett (01/29/05)
• Extending the cables between PC and Meade ETX-125 Jan Gustavsson (01/28/05)
  • Re: Extending the cables between PC and Meade ETX-125 Roger Hamlett (01/28/05)
    • Re: Extending the cables between PC and Meade ETX-125 Jan Gustavsson (01/28/05)
• LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking justbeats (01/28/05)
  • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking RichA (01/28/05)
  • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking HAVRILIAK (01/28/05)
  • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking Chris L Peterson (01/28/05)
  • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking Roger Hamlett (01/28/05)
    • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking justbeats (01/28/05)
      • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking Roger Hamlett (01/28/05)
      • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking justbeats (01/29/05)
      • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking Roger Hamlett (01/29/05)
  • Re: LX200 - best solution to "perfect" tracking Steve Sherman (01/29/05)
• New Image of the Week Gianluca Masi (01/28/05)
• Another astronomy web radio show... Uncle Bob (01/28/05)
• If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Jason Macadamia (01/28/05)
  • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... SaberScorpX (01/28/05)
    • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Nick Theodorakis (01/29/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Brian Tung (01/29/05)
      • If Neptune goes supernova, was Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Nick Theodorakis (01/30/05)
      • Re: If Neptune goes supernova, was Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Brian Tung (01/30/05)
  • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Michael Barlow (01/28/05)
    • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Michael Barlow (01/28/05)
    • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Tim Killian (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Stupendous_Man (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Tim Killian (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Jason Macadamia (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Mark (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Intertracer (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Straw Day (01/29/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Mark (01/29/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... canopus56 (01/31/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... canopus56 (01/31/05)
  • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... RMOLLISE (01/28/05)
    • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Mark (01/28/05)
    • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Jason Macadamia (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... Bill McHale (01/28/05)
      • Re: If one of our neighboring stars like Proxima Centauri went nova... RMOLLISE (01/29/05)
• what shortwave frequency for "listening" to Jupiter Jon Fox (01/28/05)
  • Re: what shortwave frequency for "listening" to Jupiter Elivs Stik (01/28/05)
  • Re: what shortwave frequency for "listening" to Jupiter David Knisely (01/28/05)
  • Re: what shortwave frequency for "listening" to Jupiter Sayf Connary (01/28/05)
• New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Mike Jones (01/28/05)
  • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Tim Killian (01/28/05)
    • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular AFM_at_andersonsoftware.ca (01/28/05)
  • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Dan Chaffee (01/28/05)
    • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Mike Jones (01/28/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular RichA (01/28/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular AFM_at_andersonsoftware.ca (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular CHASLX200 (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Chris1011 (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular CHASLX200 (01/29/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular RichA (01/30/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular CHASLX200 (01/30/05)
  • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular RichA (01/28/05)
  • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Peter Bealo (01/28/05)
    • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular Mike Jones (01/28/05)
      • Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular JP O'Neil (01/29/05)
• Online observing journals and/or blogs? Kelly Beatty (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? Brian Tung (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? Elivs Stik (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? Anthony Ayiomamitis (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? Jeff Polston (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? Mark (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? Florian (01/28/05)
  • Re: Online observing journals and/or blogs? RMOLLISE (01/28/05)
• Titan cow emissions? sawlake-gg_at_yahoo.com (01/28/05)
• Youngest Globular Cluster in the Galaxy? Magnificent Universe (01/27/05)
• Just a bit more help on binocular choice, please ROM SPACE KNIGHT NURSE (01/27/05)
  • Re: Just a bit more help on binocular choice, please Florian (01/27/05)
    • Re: Just a bit more help on binocular choice, please SaberScorpX (01/28/05)
  • Re: Just a bit more help on binocular choice, please shneor (01/28/05)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Webpage with Links to Amateur Astronomy articles and downloads Larry G (01/27/05)
  • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Webpage with Links to Amateur Astronomy articles and downloads Ishtim (01/28/05)
    • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Webpage with Links to Amateur Astronomy articles and downloads Larry G (01/28/05)
  • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Webpage with Links to Amateur Astronomy articles and downloads Larry G (01/28/05)
• Partners required for exciting hands-on astronomical project. Martin Nicholson (01/27/05)
  • Re: Partners required for exciting hands-on astronomical project. laurenc319_at_aol.com (01/28/05)
    • Re: Partners required for exciting hands-on astronomical project. Elivs Stik (01/28/05)
• Ebay scam????? szaki (01/27/05)
  • Re: Ebay scam????? Impact9 (01/27/05)
    • Re: Ebay scam????? Szaki (01/28/05)
      • Re: Ebay scam????? Elivs Stik (01/28/05)
  • Re: Ebay scam????? Elivs Stik (01/28/05)
    • Re: Ebay scam????? Szaki (01/28/05)
      • Re: Ebay scam????? Straw Day (01/29/05)
• early PST H-alpha images Maurice Gavin (01/27/05)
• Best Tripod for a Celestron N11GPS? Too_Many_Tools (01/27/05)
  • Re: Best Tripod for a Celestron N11GPS? RMOLLISE (01/27/05)
  • Re: Best Tripod for a Celestron N11GPS? Too_Many_Tools (01/28/05)
• Best Tripod for a Celestron N11GPS? Too_Many_Tools (01/27/05)
  • Re: Best Tripod for a Celestron N11GPS? Roger Hamlett (01/27/05)
• weather I. Schott-Sherive (01/27/05)
  • Re: weather Alexander Avtanski (01/27/05)
• I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Johnny Lightning (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( laura halliday (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Paul Lawler (01/29/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Ian Robelot (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( JJK (01/27/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Ian Robelot (01/27/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( JJK (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( starlord (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Robert English (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( hockenmeenchianuk (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Szaki (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Rod Mollise (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Joe S. (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( CHASLX200 (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Sketcher (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Mark (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Jan Owen (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( John Solver (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( capntripps_at_clearviewcatv.net (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Ioannis (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( RichA (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Uncle Bob (01/27/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( RichA (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Martin R. Howell (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Larry G (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Mike Reed (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Axel (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( starburst (01/27/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( SaberScorpX (01/28/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Jan Gustavsson (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Ace Throwaway (01/27/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Tim Auton (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Szaki (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Ernie (01/28/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Johnny Lightning (01/28/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( John Solver (01/28/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( John Solver (01/28/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Michael Barlow (01/28/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( D. Couillard (01/28/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( canopus56 (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Mark Smith (01/28/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Elivs Stik (01/28/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Szaki (01/28/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Straw Day (01/29/05)
      • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Szaki (01/29/05)
  • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Dennis Woos (01/28/05)
    • Re: I feel I have wasted $1000 dollars :( Paul Lawler (01/29/05)
• What happened to SEDS? Stephen Paul (01/27/05)
  • Re: What happened to SEDS? Uncle Bob (01/27/05)
    • Re: What happened to SEDS? Szaki (01/27/05)
      • Re: What happened to SEDS? shneor (01/27/05)
    • Re: What happened to SEDS JOHN PAZMINO (01/31/05)
• A New Journal for Double Star Observers: Call for Submissions Rod Mollise (01/27/05)
  • Hey Rod! Doink (01/27/05)
    • Re: Hey Rod! RMOLLISE (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hey Rod! WA2GUF_at_netscape.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hey Rod! RMOLLISE (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hey Rod! WA2GUF_at_netscape.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Hey Rod! RMOLLISE (01/27/05)
• Re: Free mirror testing rmorea_at_satx.rr.com (01/27/05)
• Telescope & CSI! starlord (01/27/05)
• Why do stars twinkle? Cathy (01/27/05)
  • Re: Why do stars twinkle? William Foley (01/27/05)
    • Re: Why do stars twinkle? Mij Adyaw (01/27/05)
      • Re: Why do stars twinkle? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Why do stars twinkle? Florian (01/27/05)
      • Re: Why do stars twinkle? John Solver (01/28/05)
      • Re: Why do stars twinkle? Mack C. Farrington (01/28/05)
  • Re: Why do stars twinkle? I. Schott-Sherive (01/27/05)
  • Re: Why do stars twinkle? Shawn (01/27/05)
• new Astronomical Games: Bouncing Back Brian Tung (01/26/05)
  • Re: new Astronomical Games: Bouncing Back canopus56 (01/27/05)
    • Re: new Astronomical Games: Bouncing Back Brian Tung (01/27/05)
• Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Uncle Bob (01/26/05)
  • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Killian (01/26/05)
  • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Doink (01/26/05)
    • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? OG (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Doink (01/26/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? OG (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Ed T (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? OG (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Ed T (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? William Foley (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? OG (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Doink (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? M104galaxy_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
    • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? WayneH (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? OG (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? WayneH (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? OG (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Mark (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Douglas A. Shrader (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? richard schumacher (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Douglas A. Shrader (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Auton (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Douglas A. Shrader (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Brian Tung (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Douglas A. Shrader (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Brian Tung (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Martin Brown (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Regnirps (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Martin Brown (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Ed T (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Regnirps (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? HAVRILIAK (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Jax (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Martin Brown (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Killian (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Regnirps (01/30/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Regnirps (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? richard schumacher (01/28/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Douglas A. Shrader (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Douglas A. Shrader (01/29/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Regnirps (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? richard schumacher (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Shawn (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Robert English (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? M104galaxy_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Killian (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Sayf Connary (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Doink (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? WayneH (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? WayneH (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? M104galaxy_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? M104galaxy_at_gmail.com (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Auton (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Shawn (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Kevin M. Vernon (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Shawn (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? richard schumacher (01/27/05)
    • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? CLT (01/27/05)
    • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Martin Brown (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Killian (01/27/05)
  • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? RichA (01/27/05)
  • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/27/05)
    • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Tim Killian (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? Shawn (01/27/05)
      • Re: Is it me, or is it getting hot in here? chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/28/05)
• Smart-1 Images of the Moon Gareth Slee (01/26/05)
  • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Tim Killian (01/26/05)
    • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/26/05)
    • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Ernie Wright (01/26/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/26/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Szaki (01/26/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/27/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Szaki (01/27/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/27/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Szaki (01/27/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/28/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon SPAMtrap_at_Starry-Nite.net (01/27/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/27/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Szaki (01/28/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Szaki (01/28/05)
    • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon OG (01/26/05)
      • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon David Nakamoto (01/27/05)
  • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Michael McCulloch (01/26/05)
  • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon CLT (01/27/05)
  • Re: Smart-1 Images of the Moon Paul Neave (01/27/05)
• Comet Machholz and IC 1848 this Saturday - Imaging oppty? pslipscomb_at_excite.com (01/26/05)
• Meteorite hits Cambodia, sparks fires Algomeysa2 (01/26/05)
  • Re: Meteorite hits Cambodia, sparks fires Chris L Peterson (01/26/05)
    • Re: Meteorite hits Cambodia, sparks fires WayneH (01/26/05)
    • Re: Meteorite hits Cambodia, sparks fires RichA (01/26/05)
  • Re: Meteorite hits Cambodia, sparks fires Davoud (01/26/05)
• examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Ian Robelot (01/26/05)
  • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Doink (01/26/05)
    • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Szaki (01/26/05)
      • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Ian Robelot (01/27/05)
      • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Szaki (01/27/05)
      • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Ian Robelot (01/27/05)
      • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? David Knisely (01/27/05)
      • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? David Knisely (01/27/05)
    • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Ian Robelot (01/27/05)
  • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Phil (01/26/05)
    • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Phil (01/26/05)
    • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/27/05)
      • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Phil (01/27/05)
  • Re: examples of sunspots taken with Synta or equivalent 6" refractor and webcam?? Martin R. Howell (01/26/05)
• Magnitude from photon counts Bill C (01/26/05)
  • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/26/05)
    • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Jim Miller (01/26/05)
    • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Steve Taylor (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Stupendous_Man (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Tim Auton (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Stupendous_Man (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Dan Mckenna (01/29/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/29/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Martin Brown (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts tholen_at_antispam.ham (01/27/05)
    • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Peter Webb (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Peter Webb (01/28/05)
      • Re: Magnitude from photon counts Chris L Peterson (01/28/05)
  • Re: Magnitude from photon counts John Stolz (01/27/05)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: ATM Foucault Mirror Surface Profiler Software Larry G (01/26/05)
  • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ATM Foucault Mirror Surface Profiler Software Richard F.L.R. Snashall (01/26/05)
    • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ATM Foucault Mirror Surface Profiler Software Larry G (01/26/05)
      • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ATM Foucault Mirror Surface Profiler Software canopus56 (01/27/05)
      • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ATM Foucault Mirror Surface Profiler Software Larry G (01/27/05)
      • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ATM Foucault Mirror Surface Profiler Software canopus56 (01/27/05)
• Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series? Roger Hamlett (01/26/05)
  • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series? Banjo (01/27/05)
    • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series? Stephen Paul (01/27/05)
      • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series? Banjo (01/27/05)
    • Re: Celestron Nexstar or Advanced Series? Roger Hamlett (01/27/05)
• Re: *IMPORTANT* Message for Google Group, Usenet and AOL users! Uncle Bob (01/26/05)
  • Re: *IMPORTANT* Message for Google Group, Usenet and AOL users! chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/26/05)
• Looking SkyView Pro Height Extender Doink (01/26/05)
• AOL response to usenet inquiry RichA (01/25/05)
  • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry Shawn (01/25/05)
    • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
  • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
    • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry RichA (01/26/05)
  • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
    • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry Dan (01/29/05)
  • Re: AOL response to usenet inquiry Gaspard de la Nuit (01/27/05)
• Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster David Nakamoto (01/25/05)
  • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster Mark (01/25/05)
    • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster David Nakamoto (01/26/05)
      • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster tony_flanders_at_yahoo.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster David Nakamoto (01/26/05)
    • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster Frederick J. Barnett (01/26/05)
      • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster SaberScorpX (01/26/05)
  • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster SaberScorpX (01/26/05)
  • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster RichA (01/26/05)
  • Re: Saturn and a Faint Open Cluster David Knisely (01/26/05)
• New Reality TV Show Mark (01/25/05)
  • Re: New Reality TV Show Sayf Connary (01/25/05)
    • Re: New Reality TV Show Mark (01/28/05)
      • Re: New Reality TV Show Sayf Connary (01/29/05)
• Titan a Planet? Lee (01/25/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? Davoud (01/25/05)
    • Re: Titan a Planet? Lee (01/25/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? Pierre (01/25/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? Lee (01/25/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? Paul Lawler (01/29/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? Alson Wong (01/29/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? Brian Tung (01/29/05)
    • Re: Titan a Planet? eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? Davoud (01/26/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? MrNightGuy (01/25/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? DaveMan (01/25/05)
    • Re: Titan a Planet? Davoud (01/25/05)
    • Re: Titan a Planet? gluon (01/26/05)
      • Re: Titan a Planet? gluon (01/26/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? David Nakamoto (01/25/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? Iceman-Jamie (01/25/05)
    • Re: Titan a Planet? Shawn (01/25/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? MrNightsGuy (01/26/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? Alson Wong (01/26/05)
  • Re: Titan a Planet? eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
• Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? W. Wat son (01/25/05)
  • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? coppylittlehouse_at_hotmail.com (01/25/05)
    • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Florian (01/25/05)
      • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? W. Wat son (01/25/05)
      • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Florian (01/25/05)
    • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? W. Wat son (01/25/05)
      • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? coppylittlehouse_at_hotmail.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? W. Wat son (01/25/05)
      • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Steve Maddison (01/25/05)
  • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Uncle Bob (01/25/05)
    • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Steve Maddison (01/25/05)
    • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Stephen Tonkin (01/26/05)
  • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? Adam Norton (01/25/05)
    • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? W. Wat son (01/25/05)
  • Re: Retaining Binoc Lens Caps? lal_truckee (01/25/05)
• What does this mean HAVRILIAK (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does this mean Richard F.L.R. Snashall (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does this mean Chris L Peterson (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does this mean Herb York (01/25/05)
    • Re: What does this mean William Foley (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean Stephen Paul (01/25/05)
    • Re: What does this mean Rod Mollise (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean Gil (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean starburst (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean David Nakamoto (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean Pat O'Connell (01/26/05)
  • Re: What does this mean Florian (01/25/05)
    • Re: What does this mean Uncle Bob (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean RMOLLISE (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean linus_das_at_yahoo.co.uk (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean William Hamblen (01/26/05)
      • Re: What does this mean redbelly98_at_yahoo.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean RMOLLISE (01/25/05)
      • Re: What does this mean redbelly (01/29/05)
      • Re: What does this mean Michael K (01/26/05)
      • Re: What does this mean Michael Barlow (01/27/05)
  • Re: What does this mean abc (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does this mean Impact9 (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does this mean David Nakamoto (01/25/05)
• AOL to discontinue usenet services RichA (01/25/05)
  • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services Impact9 (01/25/05)
    • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services M104galaxy_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
  • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services Stephen Paul (01/25/05)
    • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services Pierre Vandevennne (01/25/05)
    • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services Herb York (01/25/05)
      • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services Stephen Paul (01/26/05)
      • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
      • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
  • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services Sweet Temptation (01/25/05)
    • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
  • Re: AOL to discontinue usenet services RMOLLISE (01/26/05)
• The quality of light on Titan Algomeysa2 (01/25/05)
  • Re: The quality of light on Titan Chris L Peterson (01/25/05)
    • Re: The quality of light on Titan David Nakamoto (01/25/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Intertracer (01/27/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Intertracer (01/27/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Tim Auton (01/27/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Steve (01/27/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Chris L Peterson (01/27/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Scott M. Kozel (01/28/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Pat O'Connell (01/28/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Intertracer (01/28/05)
      • Re: The quality of light on Titan Scott M. Kozel (01/29/05)
• Any Z-Scope owners still out there? Banjo (01/25/05)
  • Re: Any Z-Scope owners still out there? Jeff Polston (01/25/05)
• If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Jmpngtiger (01/25/05)
  • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Chris L Peterson (01/25/05)
    • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups abc (01/25/05)
      • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Chris L Peterson (01/25/05)
      • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups eat more ostrich (01/26/05)
      • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Chris L Peterson (01/26/05)
  • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Herb York (01/25/05)
    • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups abc (01/25/05)
  • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Ben Bradley (01/25/05)
  • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups abc (01/25/05)
  • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Impact9 (01/25/05)
  • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Tom Randy (01/25/05)
    • Re: If you use AOL, forget newsgroups Ben Bradley (01/26/05)
• Canon EOS Rebel T2 Max Harrell (01/24/05)
  • Re: Canon EOS Rebel T2 RichA (01/25/05)
  • Re: Canon EOS Rebel T2 starburst (01/25/05)
  • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Chris L Peterson (01/24/05)
  • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Dan McShane (01/24/05)
    • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Impact9 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Martin Brown (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Impact9 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Chris L Peterson (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique rok_at_nuk.uni-lj.si (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Dan McShane (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Chris L Peterson (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Dan McShane (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Impact9 (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Florian (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Shawn (01/25/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Tim Killian (01/25/05)
  • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Dan Moos (01/26/05)
    • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Tim Auton (01/26/05)
    • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique chris.b_at_mail.dk (01/26/05)
      • Re: Shrub Demonstrates His Binocular Technique Florian (01/26/05)
• Let Hubble die gracefully levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/24/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Sam Wormley (01/24/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully AFM_at_andersonsoftware.ca (01/24/05)
    • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Paul Winalski (01/25/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Tim Killian (01/24/05)
    • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully matt (01/24/05)
    • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully William C. Keel (01/24/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Bill Waterston (01/25/05)
    • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully starman (01/25/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully richard schumacher (01/25/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully abc (01/25/05)
  • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Hilton Evans (01/25/05)
    • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Tim Killian (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Hilton Evans (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully william.mchale_at_gmail.com (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Hilton Evans (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Tim Killian (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Dennis Woos (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Tim Killian (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Hilton Evans (01/25/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Tim Killian (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Tim Killian (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully matt (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Hilton Evans (01/27/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Regnirps (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully Phil Hawkins (01/26/05)
      • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully levin7331_at_hotmail.com (01/26/05)
    • Re: Let Hubble die gracefully JATO (01/26/05)
• Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty W. Wat son (01/24/05)
  • Re: Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty Doink (01/24/05)
    • Re: Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty W. Wat son (01/24/05)
      • Re: Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty Sayf Connary (01/25/05)
      • Re: Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty David (01/26/05)
    • Re: Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty W. Wat son (01/25/05)
  • Re: Extending the Canon 300D Rebel EOS Warranty R (01/24/05)
• Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope richard schumacher (01/24/05)
  • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Tom Kent (01/24/05)
    • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/24/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/24/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/24/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/24/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope D Schneider (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Greg Crinklaw (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Greg Crinklaw (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Christopher M. Jones (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope linus_das_at_yahoo.co.uk (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/26/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Rand Simberg (01/27/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Eric Chomko (01/27/05)
    • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope starlord (01/24/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Tim Killian (01/24/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Jorge R. Frank (01/25/05)
      • Re: Write or call Congress to save Hubble space telescope Tim Killian (01/25/05)