Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time.
From: Lefty (Ye_at_h.Right)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: Garry Johnson: "Re: Green lasers remind me of...."
- Previous message: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:10:26 GMT
> > > > > > An example of division by zero in nature.
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Thanks Bill, and I've got plenty of applications for this up my
> sleeve.
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > An empirical differentiation between mere unfortunate ignorance and
> > > full-blown metastatic stupidity.
> >
> > What was that thing they used to say on TV -
> >
> > Is that your _final_ answer ?
> >
> >
> > > > This is just the first installment of something
> > > > which is really much, much larger.
> > >
> > > No doubt.
> >
> > We need to build things piece by piece. I'm giving you something fairly
> > straightforward to attack, it is just one simple operation, a single
> > instance of division.
> >
> > Either it makes sense, or it's an attempt to square the circle.
>
> It is mental masturbation pure and simple. You idea of constructing a
clock
> out of the entire universe, a solar system or whatever rubbish you are
> proposing in no way changes the definition of a second which is what is
use
> in experiments so has zero observation consequences.
And I'm asking you why ?
> > I'm giving
> > you every opportunity, and I would in fact invite you to disprove it, if
> you
> > can show me the error I'll tell you what, I'll put $20 on your PayPal
> acct.
> > Please - save me the trouble of worrying about this stuff. Prove me
wrong.
> > All I said was that time decomposes, and basically proved it, $20 says
I'm
> > right. I think that Thomas Jefferson is going to agree with me.
>
> And who will be the judge - why you of course. I have seen crank spew
long
> enough to know all its tricks.
And I'm asking you why ?
> > I am not saying that Einstein, Pauli and Schrodinger were wrong. All I'm
> > saying, is that neither were Larry Moe and Curley.
>
> You are indulging in mental masturbation that has zero observational
> consequences and trying to palm it off as insight.
And I'm asking you why ?
-WK-
> Bill
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Uncle Al
> > > http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> > > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> > > http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Garry Johnson: "Re: Green lasers remind me of...."
- Previous message: Lefty: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Division by Zero in Nature, and Decomposition of Time."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|