Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU"
From: Roger Hamlett (rogerspamignored_at_ttelmah.demon.co.uk)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: LingChow: "Re: Liberal Pathology of HATRED"
- Previous message: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Lost in Space!! How to align?"
- In reply to: Mike Maxwell: ""'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Next in thread: RichA: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: RichA: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: Misa Wahwa: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: Mike Maxwell: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:30:17 GMT
"Mike Maxwell" <maxwell@ldc.upenn.edu> wrote in message
news:cs13oj$s0h$1@netnews.upenn.edu...
> An article at http://www.ljworld.com/section/kunews/story/192798 talks
> about a prototype telescope whose mirror is made of composites. The 16"
> telescope (unclear exactly what they're talking about, but it appears to
> include the mirror, some kind of mirror mount, and the truss tube, all
> in what I take to be a Cassegrain configuration) weighs 20 pounds. It
> was built by Kansas University, San Diego State University, Dartmouth
> College, and Composite Mirror Applications in Tucson.
>
> Apparently it's a prototype for larger telescopes--the next one will be
> a one meter mirror. But if someone started making this sort of
> telescope for amateurs... Of course, I suppose the cost of materials
> would outweight (sorry for the pun) any savings from the construction
> method.
>
> An earlier story (before they built the prototype) is at
> http://www.ljworld.com/section/archive/story/148016. And
> http://www.physics.ku.edu/facilities/ultra/specsfin.html is a rfp for
> the one meter scope.
I think you have 'hit the nail on the head', with the cost of materials
'outweighing' any savings.
The obvious design idea, is to keep weights down, and distortions from the
weight down, on larger scopes. I'd doubt if the design is
economic/practical for scopes any smaller than the prototype, and even on
this, if produced in quantity, is still likely to be more expensive than a
simple 'glass' and carbon fibre tube design...
Best Wishes
- Next message: LingChow: "Re: Liberal Pathology of HATRED"
- Previous message: Roger Hamlett: "Re: Lost in Space!! How to align?"
- In reply to: Mike Maxwell: ""'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Next in thread: RichA: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: RichA: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: Misa Wahwa: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Reply: Mike Maxwell: "Re: "'Telescope of the future' puts focus on KU""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|