Re: Ongoing Big-Bang Theory of Galaxy Evolution

From: Shawn (sdotherecurry_at_bresnananotherdotnet)
Date: 01/12/05 

Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:42:58 -0700

Paul Hollister wrote:
>>Shawn wrote:
>>
>>So forget the data that supports the Big Bang? Your model needs to
>>convincingly explain this FIRST. If not, your dead in the water.
>>When I searched your site for "red shift" I came up with zippo.
>
>
> What did you search the site with Shawn? The search engine at the bottom of
> each page in the site, which contains a book that is 340 pages long,
> provides positive search results for both "red shift" and "redshift"

snip

My bad. I only searched the fist page not the site.

>
> The entire scientific world assumes for a fact that all of the hydrogen in
> the universe was formed fait accompli 10 to 20 billion years ago by the
> single Big Bang, long before the galaxies began to form. On the blind side
> of this assumption, nobody even considers for a moment that the Cosmic
> Plasma Jets exploding out of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs),
> which are the most powerful explosions in the universe occurring in the most
> extreme supermassive densities in the universe, may be the Big-Bang process
> of hydrogen production exploding into evidence right in front of our eyes!
>
> The insight and evidence I have assembled shows that hydrogen is being
> produced by an ongoing process within each quasar, for which I coined the
> term "Ongoing Big-Bang" to emphasize the ongoing nature of the
> nucleosynthesis process. After demonstrating through evidence that this is
> indeed how all the hydrogen in the universe is formed, I showed how this
> "Ongoing Big-Bang" process gives rise to the growth and evolution of each
> active galaxy, which defines the Mainstream Sequence of Galaxy Evolution!
> This is an entirely new scientific insight Shawn. You can download Chapter 1
> Introduction with just a click of your finger. Chapter 1 Introduction shows
> how the 4-spatial dimensions of this theory correlates directly with
> Einstein's Space-Time model of the universe.

Maybe your right. Not for me to decide. Go convince the heavy
breathers in the cosmology world that your model's worth a look see,
then I'll be interested.

Shawn

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Science Disproves Evolution
    ... D, 3He, and 4He and 7Li provide strong evidence for Big Bang ... al., "The Extragalactic Universe: ... Cosmology has progressed somewhat rapidly in the last several years, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Did the big bang really happen? [New Scientist July 02]
    ... WHAT if the big bang never happened? ... Take the way galaxies are scattered across the ... There they argued that cosmologists' most cherished ... theory of the universe fails to explain certain crucial observations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang
    ... Here's a list of 30 problems with the Big Bang theory. ... Static universe models fit observational data better than expanding ... The expression ?the temperature of space? ... the microwave radiation, including its blackbody-shaped spectrum. ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • Re: OT Welcome to the New Middle Ages
    ... What was happening 10 seconds before the Big Bang (or whatever you ... It's hard to believe that the billions of stars in the universe ... possibility of religion exists. ... fallacious" are atheists like yourself. ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Refuting the Big Bang Theory
    ... the big bang of some 17.6 billion years ago started it ... drawing together by increasing gravity and ignited to become stars. ... resulting layout of the universe has to be completely accidental as well. ... galaxy to solar system to planet were perfectly fine-tuned. ...
    (talk.origins)