Re: New Hires Lunar Images
From: Carl D. Smith (cdsmith69NOSPAM_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: PC Board with Accurate Clock?"
- Previous message: Greg Crinklaw: "Re: wasteful government spending??"
- In reply to: Wes Higgins: "New Hires Lunar Images"
- Next in thread: Tim Auton: "Re: New Hires Lunar Images"
- Reply: Tim Auton: "Re: New Hires Lunar Images"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:39:22 GMT
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:24:01 GMT, Wes Higgins
<starman2@flash.net> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have added seven new Hires Lunar images to my simple one page Astro
>web site, if interested see link below and images marked as new.
>http://higginsandsons.com/astro/
>Schiller is my favorite of the seven new images.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Wes Higgins
Excellent images.
So does anyone else have a problem with seeing lunar images
properly when they are lit from below?
When I look at the ones where the light comes from below, such as
the "Pitatus and Hesiodus A," I see the depth inverted. Craters
look like mesas, cracks look like ridges, small craters look like
bumps.
Sometimes if I stare at it long enough and tell myself "it's lit
from below. That's a crater. It goes down. Not up." it will
suddenly pop into the right perspective. Sometimes I am not able
to see it right without rotating the image 180 so the lighting
comes from above.
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: PC Board with Accurate Clock?"
- Previous message: Greg Crinklaw: "Re: wasteful government spending??"
- In reply to: Wes Higgins: "New Hires Lunar Images"
- Next in thread: Tim Auton: "Re: New Hires Lunar Images"
- Reply: Tim Auton: "Re: New Hires Lunar Images"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
