Re: Newbie looking at buying a scope....

thedeepabyss_at_whoever.com
Date: 01/17/05


Date: 16 Jan 2005 22:49:29 -0800

Thanks for the advice, everyone. I think that I was trying to get the
best of all worlds when I was considering the ETX-70AT; but I'm going
to bite the bullet and get a reflector. WHICH reflector is still up in
the air....

After I wrote this, I tracked down the Orion website to get more
detailed specs; I noticed that they have a couple of other scopes that
are quite interesting, mostly because of smaller size - the Starblast
Astro "kiddiescope" is a 4.5"; it looks like a great try at a true
young beginner's scope. I'm not sure about it though, its 450mm focal
length and F/4 - doesn't that mean that it'll be good with "low-power"
eyepieces but it won't do deep space well? It's a quite bit too short,
also - it could really use a tripod.

The other really interesting one is the SpaceProbe 130 EQ Reflector - a
5" 900mm F/6.9 - it's not much lighter than the 6" Dobsonian (30 vs.
34 lbs) but it's got an equatorial mount and an aluminum tripod that
folds for transport, and it's 12" shorter overall. Do you think that an
equatorial mount is something that will allow her (my 8-yo) to grow, or
is it going to be too complex? My other question would be to anyone
who's used one of these scopes specifically - is the tripod very
sturdy? And how high is the eyepiece above the ground?

I just don't know.... I think I'll try to find somewhere that has the
5" Orion to take a look at - it seems a logical choice since I'm
looking for something more portable. Anyways, thanks for the help so
far!

ECM



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Newbie looking at buying a scope....
    ... > to bite the bullet and get a reflector. ... > also - it could really use a tripod. ... > 34 lbs) but it's got an equatorial mount and an aluminum tripod that ... > who's used one of these scopes specifically - is the tripod very ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Recommendation for Decent Quality, Portable Go-To Scope
    ... > refractor mounted on a camera tripod. ... > eyepieces, including two of the Meade Ultra-Wide big chunks of glass (4.7mm ... Thus a GEM mount is not a solution because in addition you'll need to ... OTA's are great scopes; they require a GEM mount, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Zhumell vs. Celestron vs. Meade
    ... First off none of these scopes on their present mount will be adequate ... The Zhumell seems to be a full length. ... >Celestron FirstScope 114 EQ Short Newtonian Reflector ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: OT: Telescopes
    ... No - a reflector isn't 'better', anymore than a refractor is 'better'. ... You can go and see, touch, use different scopes and get an idea of what ... I once bought a telescope setup loaded with goodies that had ...
    (alt.smokers.pipes)
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!
    ... The big refractor ... The 6 inch Meade with the motor drive is great because ... I set the tripod height at 43 inches to the base, ... than it is to rotate the reflector OTA. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)