Re: Red or green laser?
From: Chris L Peterson (clp_at_alumni.caltech.edu)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: Florian: "Re: Binoculars w/reduced effective apertures"
- Previous message: Sketcher: "Binoculars w/reduced effective apertures"
- In reply to: Warm Nights: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Next in thread: Eat More Possum: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Reply: Eat More Possum: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Reply: JOHN PAZMINO: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:10:34 GMT
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:04:51 -0600, Warm Nights <warmish@metro.org> wrote:
>baloney! I and many others have been using red lasers at night for years _
>and the public sure sees them point at celestial objects _
>
>Yes the green is easier to see - significantly easier to see. But to say
>the red
>lasers cant be seen is total nonsense.
I feel sorry for you, living under such miserable atmospheric conditions that a
<5mW red laser makes an effective pointer to celestial objects! But for anyone
living where the air is fairly clean, you really do need a green source if you
hope for people to see much. If it is very clean and dry (as where I live) even
the green laser is hard to see for anyone more than a few feet from the source.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Next message: Florian: "Re: Binoculars w/reduced effective apertures"
- Previous message: Sketcher: "Binoculars w/reduced effective apertures"
- In reply to: Warm Nights: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Next in thread: Eat More Possum: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Reply: Eat More Possum: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Reply: JOHN PAZMINO: "Re: Red or green laser?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]