Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)
From: Davoud (star_at_sky.net)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Previous message: JP O'Neil: "Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular"
- In reply to: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Next in thread: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: John Shakespeare: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: Randy L.: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: William Foley: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:37:22 -0500
Gareth Slee:
> This doesn't sound like the Davoud I know...
It isn't. Oh, I authored it, but I would never have guessed that anyone
in this forum would take it seriously. Talk about acceptance on blind
faith!
How do these folks handle the spoken language, which has no smileys? If
someone says "It's raining cats and dogs," do they go outside to check
and then report "No, that's water?"
Davoud
;>) ;>) ;<) !!!
-- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
- Next message: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Previous message: JP O'Neil: "Re: New Elcan apo refractor is spectacular"
- In reply to: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Next in thread: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: Gareth Slee: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: John Shakespeare: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: Randy L.: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Reply: William Foley: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|