Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?
mario_884_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Dr. Stupid: "60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster"
- Previous message: Randy L.: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- In reply to: RMOLLISE: "Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?"
- Next in thread: RMOLLISE: "Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?"
- Reply: RMOLLISE: "Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jan 2005 20:48:12 -0800
Thats a bit harsh, Rodmeister
I think it looks alright. Besides, most scopes look the same in the
dark ;)
Celestron's aim, in this case, was supplying an _affordable_ scope, and
more power to them.
In a way, I was glad they didnt just try to out-do Meade with a bigger,
better, faster, more expensive scope which only a handful of people can
afford.
Still, Meade does currently seem to have the advantage when it comes to
advanced innovative features..
Mario
RMOLLISE wrote:
> Michael McCulloch wrote:
> > In what particular areas, Rod? Just curious...
> >
> --Trivial, I suppose, but this is an ugly _looking_ scope IMHO
compared
> to the NS GPS. The Nexstar GPS always looked like it belonged on the
> bridge of the starship Enterprise...this one looks like it would be
> most at home in a 1979 disco! ;-)
> Maybe I'm just disappointed in that I expected "New and Innovative"
> instead of just "New and Cheap."
>
>
> Peace,
> Rod Mollise
> Author of:_Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
> http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html
- Next message: Dr. Stupid: "60mm Tasco vs. 20" Starmaster"
- Previous message: Randy L.: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- In reply to: RMOLLISE: "Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?"
- Next in thread: RMOLLISE: "Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?"
- Reply: RMOLLISE: "Re: New Celestron CPC scopes dissapointing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|