Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)
From: William Foley (bill1401a_at_verizon.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Previous message: allisonki_at_IGNmail.com: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- In reply to: Davoud: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Next in thread: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:10:51 GMT
Glad I read on - Yes, for some comments it IS a good idea to use a smiley or
a <g>.
I am sure that Bishop Ussher had the best intentions when he wasted years of
his life figuring out that the creation was October 23, 4004 B.C. Wonderful
proof that the best intentions are no guard against being totally and
hopelessly misguided.
Good one, Davoud!!
Bill
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Previous message: allisonki_at_IGNmail.com: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- In reply to: Davoud: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Next in thread: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Sam Wormley is Wrong (was: WHAT'S NEW...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|