Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings
From: Chuck Taylor (not_at_thisaddress)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: starlord: "Re: How much does the way a telescope looks play a role in whether you buy it?"
- Previous message: Phil Hawkins: "CDC Assistance"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings"
- Next in thread: bratislav3162_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings"
- Reply: bratislav3162_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:28:41 -0800
Mark wrote:
> Chuck -
>
> For those of us who didn't scrutinize the original release, can you
> summarize what the updates are? It seems to me that they still make
> heavy use of the R-C term.
>
> http://www.meade.com/rcx400/
Hi Mark,
They added this line:
"The RCX design is very similar to the Classical RC and achieves the
same benefits by using a hyperbolic secondary with a new advanced front
corrector plate and primary mirror that together perform as a hyperbolic
primary."
Of course, the rest of the world would still call that an aspherical SCT
and not an R-C
So they are being slightly more honest now that they were caught. It
reminds me of StupendousVue's "EDT" nonsense.
Clear Skies
Chuck Taylor
Do you observe the moon?
Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/
Are you interested in optics?
Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ATM_Optics_Software/
************************************
- Next message: starlord: "Re: How much does the way a telescope looks play a role in whether you buy it?"
- Previous message: Phil Hawkins: "CDC Assistance"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings"
- Next in thread: bratislav3162_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings"
- Reply: bratislav3162_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Minutes from Meade RCX meetings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|