Re: Laser versus Non-Laser Collimation

From: Axel (ritesh_laud_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/02/05 

Date: 1 Mar 2005 18:42:30 -0800

> Repointing the primary to intersect the diagonal a bit more toward
the
> focuser is a much easier adjustment to make, than to actually
reposition
> the diagonal.

Hmm, I don't think that this accomplishes the same thing. By altering
the tilt of the primary, the cone of light will reflect off the
secondary at a different angle and will no longer be parallel to the
focuser axis. If the secondary tilt is adjusted to compensate, aren't
you essentially back where you started?

Cheers,
Ritesh