Re: Laser versus Non-Laser Collimation
dkelvey_at_hotmail.com
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: God's Science At Last! - Day of Wrath Survival Manual Available Now!"
- Previous message: Pierre Vandevenne: "Re: God's Science At Last! - Day of Wrath Survival Manual Available Now!"
- In reply to: canopus56: "Re: Laser versus Non-Laser Collimation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Mar 2005 16:39:41 -0800
Hi
You can not do a fine star collimation without seeing the secondary's
reflection as looking offset relative to the primaries edges. This is
a myth of non-offset collimation. What happens if the secondary is
not offset relative to the tube is that the final collimation will put
the optical axis tilted relative to the tube. This is not usually
a problem except fast mirrors on EQ mounts.
If there is an offset along the tube that should be fixed correctly.
Even so, this offset does not effect the reflection. This is the
centering
of the secondary as seen in the focuser tube.
Please go back and read Olif's site more carefully. This is a hard one
to understand.
I've used the Barlowed laser and it works great. It is so good that I
wouldn't even bother playing with a spot laser type. There are so many
trivial non-critical things that will make a spot laser alignment bad
that the Barlow ignores.
Dwight
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: God's Science At Last! - Day of Wrath Survival Manual Available Now!"
- Previous message: Pierre Vandevenne: "Re: God's Science At Last! - Day of Wrath Survival Manual Available Now!"
- In reply to: canopus56: "Re: Laser versus Non-Laser Collimation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|