Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else
From: Tim Killian (TJK_at_notmyrealemail.com)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Previous message: canopus56: "Re: Need suggestions - Astronomer gift baskets?????"
- In reply to: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Reply:(deleted message) DustyMars: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:56:50 -0700
The problem he points out is that finding and developing most
"solutions" requires ready and affordable sources of energy and water,
and a working infrastructure with roads, railways, manufacturing plants,
etc. It takes lots of oil/coal/water and reliable transportation to
build renewable systems or nuclear plants and bring them online.
Chris L Peterson wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:45:02 -0700, Tim Killian <TJK@notmyrealemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>A very interesting and sobering article that puts many current events
>>into perspective:
>>
>>http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/_/id/7203633
>>
>>Motel Six might have to change their slogan.
>
>
> There is nothing but good news in that article. We waste vast amounts of
> energy, and certainly have the knowledge and technology to come up with
> alternatives. And IMO, some lifestyle and economic changes on the part
> of the developed world are in order. The increased cost of fossil fuels
> will one day be seen as instrumental in saving the world, not destroying
> it.
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> Chris L Peterson
> Cloudbait Observatory
> http://www.cloudbait.com
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Previous message: canopus56: "Re: Need suggestions - Astronomer gift baskets?????"
- In reply to: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Reply:(deleted message) DustyMars: "Re: Good news on light pollution, and not much else"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|