sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Upgrade mount/drive for an old Meade LX3, craig510a3
  • Re: Upgrade mount/drive for an old Meade LX3, Jan Owen
  • Re: Upgrade mount/drive for an old Meade LX3, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Upgrade mount/drive for an old Meade LX3, William Hamblen
• Jupiter Image, Dennis Woos
  • Re: Jupiter Image, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Jupiter Image, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Jupiter Image, Chris L Peterson
• 8" performing like a 12" in angular resolution?, Sidney
  • Re: 8" performing like a 12" in angular resolution?, Larry G
    • Re: 8" performing like a 12" in angular resolution?, Sidney
  • Re: 8" performing like a 12" in angular resolution?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: 8" performing like a 12" in angular resolution?, AFM
• big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Sam Wormley
  • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, chris . b
    • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Sam Wormley
      • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Florian
  • Re: big sunspot transiting the solar disk now, Carsten A. Arnholm
• Starry Night Pro question, Carsten A. Arnholm
  • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Doink
    • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Carsten A. Arnholm
      • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Doink
      • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Carsten A. Arnholm
  • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Beta Persei
    • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Carsten A. Arnholm
      • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Beta Persei
      • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Beta Persei
      • Re: Starry Night Pro question, Carsten A. Arnholm
• The weather in the N.E., RichA
  • Re: The weather in the N.E., katrinaxx
• Last Call for Cherry Springs Star Party!, Ted Nichols II
• full online version of the book, Vlcek
• Plane Passing in Front of the Moon, RS
  • Re: Plane Passing in Front of the Moon, CLT
  • Re: Plane Passing in Front of the Moon, RichA
  • Re: Plane Passing in Front of the Moon, William Hamblen
• Backyard Images of M65 & M66, RS
  • Re: Backyard Images of M65 & M66, Marty
  • Re: Backyard Images of M65 & M66, Tom Randy
• Can Anyone Identify These Lunar Features Please?, RS
  • Re: Can Anyone Identify These Lunar Features Please?, CLT
    • Re: Can Anyone Identify These Lunar Features Please?, RS
    • Re: Can Anyone Identify These Lunar Features Please?, RS
• Apparent Distance, Ioannis
  • Re: Apparent Distance, anteperkovic
    • Re: Apparent Distance, Ioannis
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Martin Brown
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Ioannis
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Ioannis
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Ioannis
    • Message not available
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Apparent Distance, Ioannis
  • Re: Apparent Distance, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Apparent Distance, William Hamblen
• Re: Analemma with the Temple of Aphaia (#10 of 11), Mike Simmons
• Re: For Daniel Joseph Min - Google supporters, imabrowneye
• Celestron NexStar 4 GT auto-align problem?, Doug McLaren
  • Re: Celestron NexStar 4 GT auto-align problem?, Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Celestron NexStar 4 GT auto-align problem?, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Celestron NexStar 4 GT auto-align problem?, Les Blalock
    • Re: Celestron NexStar 4 GT auto-align problem?, rok
• Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, Orion
  • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, Davoud
  • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, CLT
    • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, Starlord
  • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, Wally Anglesea™
  • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, Tom Randy
  • Re: Asteroid Targeted by Massive United States and Russian Military Forces Missile Launch Hit and Destroyed, Debris Rains down Upon Northern Hemispheric Regions, John Carruthers
• s.a.a. vs. other forums, Larry Stedman
  • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, Starlord
  • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, Tim Auton
    • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, RichA
      • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, Starlord
  • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, shneor
  • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, AstroHoney
    • Re: s.a.a. vs. other forums, Mij Adyaw
• slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevenne
  • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Davoud
    • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Tim Auton
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Jan Owen
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, CLT
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, CLT
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, geraldkelleher
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Doink
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, John Carruthers
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Uncle Bob
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Richard Tobin
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Tim Auton
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Doink
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Brian Tung
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Ed T
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Tim Auton
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Ed T
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Cousin Ricky
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Roland Roberts
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Florian
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Florian
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Clayton Doyles
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, RichA
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Ioannis
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Starlord
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Tim Auton
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Florian
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Shawn
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Havriliak
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Havriliak
      • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Havriliak
  • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Cousin Ricky
    • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Uncle Bob
  • Re: slightly OT, but still connected, Drew
• lens placement in cells, Mike
  • Re: lens placement in cells, Bob May
    • Re: lens placement in cells, Hilton
      • Re: lens placement in cells, RichA
      • Re: lens placement in cells, Bob May
• Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
  • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, chris . b
  • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, William McHale
  • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Mark D
    • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, dougspeterson
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Magnum
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Sidney
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, vahe240d
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Sidney
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Ed T
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Mark D
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Mark D
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Sidney
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, AFM
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Sidney
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Mark D
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, AFM
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, vahe240d
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, Joe Bergeron
      • Re: Astro-Physics upgrading smaller refractors, RichA
• Web site updated, Starlord
  • Re: Web site updated, Doink
    • Re: Web site updated, Shawn
      • Re: Web site updated, Shawn
      • Re: Web site updated, Starlord
      • Re: Web site updated, Doink
• Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Ralph Hertle
  • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Brian Tung
    • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Havriliak
      • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Ralph Hertle
  • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], William McHale
    • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Erik
    • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Ralph Hertle
  • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Shawn
    • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Ralph Hertle
      • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Erik
      • Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ], Shawn
• air spaced optics, Mike
  • Re: air spaced optics, Dan Chaffee
    • Re: air spaced optics, Mike
      • Re: air spaced optics, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: air spaced optics, decaf
      • Re: air spaced optics, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: air spaced optics, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: air spaced optics, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: air spaced optics, decaf
    • Re: air spaced optics, MitchAlsup
      • Re: air spaced optics, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: air spaced optics, decaf
      • Re: air spaced optics, vahe240d
      • Re: air spaced optics, decaf
      • Re: air spaced optics, vahe240d
      • Re: air spaced optics, Dan Chaffee
• Converting Canon Rebels, etc, to astro cams, RichA
  • Re: Converting Canon Rebels, etc, to astro cams, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Converting Canon Rebels, etc, to astro cams, RichA
      • Re: Converting Canon Rebels, etc, to astro cams, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Converting Canon Rebels, etc, to astro cams, RichA
      • Re: Converting Canon Rebels, etc, to astro cams, Stephen Paul
• lx-90, Terry A Haimann
  • Re: lx-90, otakenji
    • Re: lx-90, Mike Kreuzer
      • Re: lx-90, Terry A Haimann
• Re: Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good you ar, Orion
• sky background evaluation, Pierre Vandevennne
• Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Gary Heath
  • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Davoud
    • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Gary Heath
  • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Jax
  • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, MitchAlsup
  • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Mike Jones
    • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Texas Hill Country astronomy, any good?, Jim Henson
• Hubble Webcast Announcement, Lucy Albert
• Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, Roland Roberts
  • Re: Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, Davoud
  • Re: Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, offaxis2
    • Re: Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, chris . b
      • Re: Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, Roland Roberts
      • Re: Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, Jim Henson
  • Re: Finding not-so-odd parts for scopes, e.g., metric screws, Doink
• Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, David Nakamoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Roland Roberts
    • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Mark Gingrich
      • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Brian Tung
      • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Anthony Ayiomamitis
      • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Howard Lester
      • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Philip Morrison, has died at the age of 89, Shawn
• spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, jtaylor
  • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Martin Brown
  • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Bob May
    • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Gil
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, William McHale
    • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, jtaylor
  • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Message not available
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Brian Tung
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Brian Tung
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, dkelvey
    • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, jtaylor
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Dan Chaffee
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, Martin Brown
      • Re: spherical mirrors matching the curve of parabolic, nick
• Wind and Cars in Rosamond, Starlord
  • Re: Wind and Cars in Rosamond, jtaylor
    • Re: Wind and Cars in Rosamond, Starlord
      • Re: Wind and Cars in Rosamond, jtaylor
• John Edwards=John Edmund=John Patterson=John Jacobson=John Shuttlebower=Ryan Walters???, Uncle Bob
  • Re: John Edwards=John Edmund=John Patterson=John Jacobson=John Shuttlebower=Ryan Walters???, John Edwards
    • Re: John Edwards=John Edmund=John Patterson=John Jacobson=John Shuttlebower=Ryan Walters???, Uncle Bob
      • Re: John Edwards=John Edmund=John Patterson=John Jacobson=John Shuttlebower=Ryan Walters???, John Edwards
      • Re: John Edwards=John Edmund=John Patterson=John Jacobson=John Shuttlebower=Ryan Walters???, Uncle Bob
• Problem Looking Through Binoculars, msterspy
  • Re: Problem Looking Through Binoculars, Ioannis
    • Re: Problem Looking Through Binoculars, Brian Tung
    • Re: Problem Looking Through Binoculars, msterspy
  • Re: Problem Looking Through Binoculars, William Hamblen
• planetary imaging with an achro refractor question, John Edwards
  • Re: planetary imaging with an achro refractor question, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: planetary imaging with an achro refractor question, tjp314
• How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Larry Brown
  • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Tom Hise
    • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, eawckyegcy
  • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Davoud
    • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Ed T
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Davoud
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Marc Miles
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Davoud
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Marc Miles
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Algomeysa2
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Marc Miles
  • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, eawckyegcy
  • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Matt J. McCullar
    • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Bruce Schupler
      • Re: How to obtain an astronomy merit badge - 1940, Jeff
• Uti telescopes, expensive??, Szaki
  • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Szaki
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Szaki
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, tony_flanders
    • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Szaki
    • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Bill Meyers
  • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, RichA
    • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Szaki
  • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Luca
  • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Jeff Setzer
    • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, RichA
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Szaki
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, RichA
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, Jeff Setzer
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, RichA
      • Re: Uti telescopes, expensive??, tony_flanders
• Text listing of Skywizard catalogue, canopus56
  • Re: Text listing of Skywizard catalogue, Larry Stedman
    • Re: Text listing of Skywizard catalogue, Steve Gottlieb
      • Re: Text listing of Skywizard catalogue, canopus56
  • Re: Text listing of Skywizard catalogue, Jim Celebucki
    • Re: Text listing of Skywizard catalogue, canopus56
• Psych out for Mars, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Psych out for Mars, Trane Francks
    • Re: Psych out for Mars, David Nakamoto
• what a pic, Mike
  • Re: what a pic, Larry Brown
• half coated lens performance, phoenix
  • Re: half coated lens performance, Ed T
    • Re: half coated lens performance, phoenix
  • Re: half coated lens performance, William Hamblen
    • Re: half coated lens performance, MitchAlsup
      • Re: half coated lens performance, Adam Norton
      • Re: half coated lens performance, Ralph Hertle
      • Re: half coated lens performance, Adam Norton
      • Re: half coated lens performance, William Hamblen
      • Re: half coated lens performance, phoenix
      • Re: half coated lens performance, Adam Norton
      • Re: half coated lens performance, Brian Tung
      • Re: half coated lens performance, MitchAlsup
      • Re: half coated lens performance, William Hamblen
    • Re: half coated lens performance, William Foley
• TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, clydec
  • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, RichA
    • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, Philippe HAAKE
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, Pierre Vandevennne
    • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, clydec
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, Ed T
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, RichA
  • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, clydec
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, clydec
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, Pierre Vandevenne
    • Re: TeleVue's 2 inch version of the TV60, RichA
• Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Bert Hyman
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Florian
    • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, DT
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Doink
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, DT
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Doink
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, DT
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Howard Lester
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, DT
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Howard Lester
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, DT
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Marty
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Doink
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, chris . b
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, RichA
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Doink
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, RichA
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Jan Owen
    • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Marty
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Marty
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Andrew
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, canopus56
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Mike
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Howard Lester
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Uncle Bob
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, defrancis
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Starlord
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Florian
      • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, chris . b
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, ROM SPACE KNIGHT NURSE
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Cousin Ricky
  • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Skip Freeman
    • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Dan Mckenna
    • Re: Why Tolerate this Newsgroup?, Doink
• Observation: Mare Humboldtianum, Sketcher
• Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 3), Sketcher
  • Re: Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 3), shneor
    • Re: Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 3), Sketcher
      • Re: Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 3), shneor
• Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 2), Sketcher
• Review: Orion 25x100 Binoculars (Part 1), Sketcher
• New Hubble releases, Florian
• Betelgeuse supernova?, Erik
  • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Jim
    • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, William McHale
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Anders Eklöf
    • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Jim
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Ed T
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Hilton Evans
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Scott Smith
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Erik
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Cousin Ricky
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, RichA
      • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, William McHale
  • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Algomeysa2
    • Re: Betelgeuse supernova?, Brian Tung
• UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
  • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", chris . b
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Mij Adyaw
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Eddie Trimarchi
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Doink
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Eddie Trimarchi
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Eddie Trimarchi
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Davoud
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", David Nakamoto
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
  • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", defrancis
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Jan Owen
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Davoud
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Cousin Ricky
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Davoud
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Cousin Ricky
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Cousin Ricky
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", defrancis
  • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", John Carruthers
    • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", chris . b
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", RichA
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", chris . b
      • Re: UFO believers are all a bit "off?", Czar7
• Craters at the moon's western edge, Markus Langlotz
  • Re: Craters at the moon's western edge, jtaylor
  • Re: Craters at the moon's western edge, Norbert
  • Re: Craters at the moon's western edge, CLT
  • Re: Craters at the moon's western edge, chris . b
    • Re: Craters at the moon's western edge, Markus Langlotz
• Hologram Telescope, phoenix
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, RichA
    • Re: Hologram Telescope, William McHale
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, William McHale
    • Re: Hologram Telescope, phoenix
      • Re: Hologram Telescope, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: Hologram Telescope, Davoud
      • Re: Hologram Telescope, shneor
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, chris . b
    • Re: Hologram Telescope, dbohara
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, thanatos
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, Martin Brown
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, MitchAlsup
    • Re: Hologram Telescope, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: Hologram Telescope, Drew
    • Re: Hologram Telescope, phoenix
• solar proms, Maurice Gavin
• the way many are, Mike
  • Re: the way many are, Shawn
  • Re: the way many are, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: the way many are, canopus56
    • Re: the way many are, Magnum
  • Re: the way many are, Doink
    • Re: the way many are, Brian Tung
    • Re: the way many are, chris . b
      • Re: the way many are, Doink
      • Re: the way many are, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: the way many are, Doink
      • Re: the way many are, geraldkelleher
  • Re: the way many are, Ernie
• HUBBLE CELEBRATES 15TH ANNIVERSARY WITH SPECTACULAR NEW IMAGES (STScI-PR05-12), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• Meade Autostar Update, Gary Reuss
  • Re: Meade Autostar Update, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Meade Autostar Update, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade Autostar Update, jamesd43081
      • Re: Meade Autostar Update, Johnny Lightning
      • Re: Meade Autostar Update, JATO
• Astronomy Books for a Pre-Schooler, Brian Reynolds
  • Re: Astronomy Books for a Pre-Schooler, Shawn
  • Re: Astronomy Books for a Pre-Schooler, adm
  • Re: Astronomy Books for a Pre-Schooler, Erik
• Oh opticians!, RichA
  • Re: Oh opticians!, RichA
    • Re: Oh opticians!, William Hamblen
      • Re: Oh opticians!, RichA
    • Re: Oh opticians!, chris . b
  • Re: Oh opticians!, Sam Wormley
• grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Mike
  • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Davoud
  • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Joe S.
  • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, RMOLLISE
    • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Mike
  • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Paul Winalski
    • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Ioannis
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Ioannis
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Ioannis
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, T.T.
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Jeff
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Mike
      • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Tom Rankin
  • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Algomeysa2
    • Re: grammatical errors and neil Armstrong, Shawn
• ethereal, Mike
  • Re: ethereal, Uncle Bob
• apollo 10, Mike
  • Re: apollo 10, Trane Francks
  • Re: apollo 10, Joe S.
  • Re: apollo 10, DT
  • Re: apollo 10, RMOLLISE
• Fireball in the New England area, Dave Bartolini
  • Re: Fireball in the New England area, sabiajohn@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Ted Molczan
  • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Ben Bradley
    • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Robert Sheaffer
      • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Brian Tung
      • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Tom Randy
      • Re: Fireball in the New England area, Chris L Peterson
• sct heart, Watclod
  • Flatulence Alert!, Jan Owen
  • Re: sct heart, RMOLLISE
    • Re: sct heart, Watclod
      • Re: sct heart, rok
• Re: ABUSE, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ABUSE, David Nakamoto
  • Re: ABUSE, Uncle Bob
    • Re: ABUSE, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: ABUSE, Uncle Bob
      • Re: ABUSE, Bubba DeBub
  • Re: ABUSE, Mike
    • Re: ABUSE, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: ABUSE, Starlord
      • Re: ABUSE, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: ABUSE, Uncle Bob
      • Re: ABUSE, Starlord
      • Re: ABUSE, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: ABUSE, Uncle Bob
      • Re: ABUSE, Starlord
      • Re: ABUSE, Doink
      • Re: ABUSE, John Carruthers
      • Re: ABUSE, Ed T
      • Re: ABUSE, John Carruthers
      • Re: ABUSE, Doink
      • Re: ABUSE, Doink
      • Re: ABUSE, Mike
      • Troll alert, Jan Owen
      • Re: Troll alert, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Troll alert, Jan Owen
      • Re: Troll alert, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Troll alert, Jan Owen
      • Re: ABUSE, chris . b
    • Re: ABUSE, Starlord
  • RE:Abuse, tom hunt
    • Re: RE:Abuse, Doink
    • Re: RE:Abuse, chris . b
  • Re: ABUSE, Erik
• Sping Skywatch (finally) Ready for Download, RMOLLISE
• Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
  • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Bubba DeBub
    • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Trane Francks
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Trane Francks
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Anthony Ayiomamitis
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Ed T
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Anthony Ayiomamitis
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Anthony Ayiomamitis
  • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Anthony, Doink
      • Re: Anthony, Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Anthony again..., Doink
      • Re: Anthony again..., Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Havriliak
      • Message not available
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Jim Easterbrook
    • Re:Jim, Doink
      • Re: Re:Jim, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Re:Jim, Doink
      • Re: Re:Jim, Jan Owen
      • Re: Re:Jim, Doink
      • Re: Re:Jim, Jan Owen
      • Re: Re:Jim, Jan Owen
      • Re: Re:Jim, Doink
      • Re: Re:Jim, Jan Owen
      • Re: Re:Jim, Doink
      • Re: Re:Jim, Jan Owen
      • Re: Re:Jim, Doink
      • Re: Re:Jim, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re:Jim, Jim Easterbrook
  • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Mark D
    • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
  • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Steve Sherman
    • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Mark D
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Mark D
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Cousin Ricky
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Mark D
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Brian Tung
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Brian Tung
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Cousin Ricky
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Steve Sherman
      • Re: Celestron C9 Question FL, Doink
• Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Jim
  • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Ioannis
      • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Ioannis
      • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Jim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, Malcolm Stewart
  • Re: Stop giving them carrot juice!!, thanatos
• Totaly Free Ringtones, Wallpapers and Mobile Games, umairrashid
• Re: How dark is dark ?, William Hamblen
  • Re: How dark is dark ?, Trane Francks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How dark is dark ?, Stuart Levy
• Up waiting for the Report from Rosamond., Uncle Bob
  • Re: Up waiting for the Report from Rosamond., Starlord
    • Re: Up waiting for the Report from Rosamond., Joe S.
      • Re: Up waiting for the Report from Rosamond., Starlord
      • Re: Up waiting for the Report from Rosamond., Uncle Bob
• Question about digital cameras, RichA
  • Re: Question about digital cameras, Doink
    • Re: Question about digital cameras, Bubba DeBub
    • Re: Question about digital cameras, RichA
• Anyone ever seen this?, RichA
  • Re: Anyone ever seen this?, OG
    • Re: Anyone ever seen this?, RichA
  • Re: Anyone ever seen this?, Stan Jensen
  • Re: Anyone ever seen this?, Len Philpot
• Astro gear pricing, Doink
  • Re: Astro gear pricing, Gaz
    • Re: Astro gear pricing, Trane Francks
  • Re: Astro gear pricing, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Astro gear pricing, halfro
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Astro gear pricing, Doink
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, chris . b
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, Anthony Ayiomamitis
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, chris . b
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, Anthony Ayiomamitis
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, Martin Brown
      • Re: Astro gear pricing, chris . b
• Binoview eyepiece sets, sally
  • Re: Binoview eyepiece sets, Mark D
    • Re: Binoview eyepiece sets, LindaLoveLots
  • Re: Binoview eyepiece sets, sally
    • Re: Binoview eyepiece sets, Mark D
  • Re: Binoview eyepiece sets, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: Binoview eyepiece sets, Gaz
• Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
  • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Watclod
      • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, gubbenimanen
  • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, Hilton
  • Re: Black Light from Shadow?, John Carruthers
• EQ-2 and C5-like telescopes, Nordica
  • Re: EQ-2 and C5-like telescopes, Stephen Paul
  • Re: EQ-2 and C5-like telescopes, Jerome Bigge
    • Re: EQ-2 and C5-like telescopes, Nordica
• Opus Observes: Jupiter and Doubles, Brian Tung
• Re: Do You Want To Know For Sure That You Are Going To Heaven? The reason some people don't know for sure if they are going to Heaven when they die is because they just don't know. The good news is that you can know for sure that you are going to Heaven wh, Bkiff
  • Re: Do You Want To Know For Sure That You Are Going To Heaven? The reason some people don't know for sure if they are going to Heaven when they die is because they just don't know. The good news is that you can know for sure that you are going to Heaven wh, Dominicus
• refractor star parties., Mike
  • Re: refractor star parties., Bubba DeBub
  • Re: refractor star parties., RichA
    • Re: refractor star parties., Stephen Paul
    • Re: refractor star parties., Ed T
      • Re: refractor star parties., RichA
    • Message not available
      • Re: refractor star parties., Bubba DeBub
    • Re: refractor star parties., Szaki
• Starry Night s/w, thinman
  • Re: Starry Night s/w, Coppy Littlehouse
• Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Havriliak
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Havriliak
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Mike
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Davoud
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Mike
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Ed T
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, William McHale
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, William McHale
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, William McHale
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, William McHale
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, chris . b
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Trane Francks
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, shneor
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, shneor
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, tjp314
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, decaf
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Brian Tung
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Erik
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Larry Brown
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Dan Mckenna
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, chris . b
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, RichA
    • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Morris Jones
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, mark13051
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, chris . b
      • Re: Why Refractors are Better!, Stephen Paul
• galileo question, luckyvomit
  • Re: galileo question, Uncle Bob
    • Re: galileo question, luckyvomit
    • Re: galileo question, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Re: galileo question, David Nakamoto
      • Re: galileo question, Glenn Holliday
      • Re: galileo question, William McHale
  • Re: galileo question, Sam Wormley
    • Re: galileo question, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: galileo question, Uncle Bob
    • Re: galileo question, GD
  • Re: galileo question, Linus Das
  • Re: galileo question, Glenn Holliday
• 14" newtonian mirror, Watclod
  • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Uncle Bob
    • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Watclod
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Uncle Bob
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, chris . b
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Uncle Bob
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, AFM
  • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, zaph
    • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Watclod
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Per Erik Jorde
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Watclod
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: 14" newtonian mirror, William McHale
• question about lunar craters, luckyvomit
  • Re: question about lunar craters, Sam Wormley
  • Re: question about lunar craters, Milton Aupperle
  • Re: question about lunar craters, CLT
• Telescopes versus camera lenses as imagers, RichA
  • Re: Telescopes versus camera lenses as imagers, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Telescopes versus camera lenses as imagers, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Telescopes versus camera lenses as imagers, RichA
      • Re: Telescopes versus camera lenses as imagers, Chris L Peterson
• Meade selling direct?, joescope
  • Re: Meade selling direct?, Doink
    • Re: Meade selling direct?, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Meade selling direct?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Meade selling direct?, Doink
  • Re: Meade selling direct?, Herb York
• HELP! - simple question!, luckyvomit
  • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Gaz
  • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Brian Tung
    • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Brian Tung
      • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Brian Tung
      • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Chris L Peterson
    • Message not available
      • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Brian Tung
  • Re: HELP! - simple question!, Tom Hise
• Astro Guiding Forums, cedric_astro
• Astro Guiding Forums Now Open!, cedric_astro
• Cassini division easier by day?, justbeats
• Relativity and age of universe, anteperkovic
  • Re: Relativity and age of universe, Mike
  • Message not available
    • Re: Relativity and age of universe, Sam Wormley
• Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Dan Mckenna
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Martin Brown
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Starlord
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, shneor
    • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Bert Hyman
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Starlord
    • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Tom Randy
      • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Marty
      • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Jan Owen
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Morris Jones
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Phil
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, canopus56
    • Re: Legalities of sidewalk astronomy, Marty
• Close Call in Rosamond, Starlord
  • Re: Close Call in Rosamond, jtaylor
• Re: Earth Day 2005 Apr 22-23, JOHN PAZMINO
• Canon A40, Doink
  • Re: Canon A40, waz
    • Re: Canon A40, Doink
      • Re: Canon A40, waz
  • Re: Canon A40, Joe R
    • Re: Canon A40, Joe R
      • Re: Canon A40, Doink
• The mind of Einstein, Mike
  • Re: The mind of Einstein, Oriel36
• Orion 100mm ED, Matthew D. Mills
  • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Doink
    • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Doink
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Drew
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Bubba DeBub
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, shneor
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Geoff
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Brian Tung
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, RichA
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Ed T
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, RichA
      • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Too_Many_Tools
  • Re: Orion 100mm ED, Stephen Paul
• OPT: An Outstanding SCT User Imaging Competition Sponsor, RMOLLISE
  • Re: OPT: An Outstanding SCT User Imaging Competition Sponsor, Coppy Littlehouse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • OPT: An Outstanding SCT User Imaging Competition Sponsor, RMOLLISE
• climate science, Mike
  • Re: climate science, Shawn
• HEQ5 Mount, Pfudrucker
• How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
  • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Brian Tung
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, nick
    • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Brian Tung
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Brian Tung
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, canopus56
      • Re: How does projection magnification in astrophotos change the Airy disk size?, Chris L Peterson
• Eyepiece ?, FiremanE42000
  • Re: Eyepiece ?, Dennis Woos
  • Re: Eyepiece ?, Joe S.
    • Re: Eyepiece ?, Doink
• Mars Attacks Newark, NJ, KDC
  • Re: Mars Attacks Newark, NJ, ROM SPACE KNIGHT NURSE
  • Re: Mars Attacks Newark, NJ, KDC
• 2005 SCT User Grand Prize, RMOLLISE
  • Re: 2005 SCT User Grand Prize, RMOLLISE
• Bose-Einsein condensate question, jimz
  • Re: Bose-Einsein condensate question, Frank Hofmann - OP/N1 RPE
    • Re: Bose-Einsein condensate question, jimz
• Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, canopus56
  • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, canopus56
    • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Message not available
      • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, canopus56
  • Message not available
    • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, Wes Higgins
  • Message not available
    • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, Chris L Peterson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CCD misunderstanding/ confusion, Bob May
• airy disc linear vs angular, Watclod
  • Re: airy disc linear vs angular, canopus56
    • Message not available
      • Re: airy disc linear vs angular, canopus56
• Re: isospeed graph of galaxy ?, canopus56
• Did you see the sun today?, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: Did you see the sun today?, chris . b
    • Re: Did you see the sun today?, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: Did you see the sun today?, Pierre Vandevennne
  • Re: Did you see the sun today?, Maurice Gavin
    • Re: Did you see the sun today?, canopus56
    • Re: Did you see the sun today?, Doink
  • Re: Did you see the sun today?, Dave Mitsky
• cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, AFM
    • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, AFM
    • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, tony_flanders
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, MitchAlsup
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, AFM
  • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, RichA
  • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Starlord
    • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, starobserver2
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Mark Gingrich
  • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, chris . b
    • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, keithparizek
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, RichA
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, William Hamblen
    • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Peter Abrahams
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, chris . b
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, Mike Simmons
      • Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?, D&D
• Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Davoud
  • Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Davoud
      • Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Brian Tung
      • Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Chris L Peterson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and JB, Roger Hinson
• Constrast loss due to sheer light gathering & not C.O., Watclod
  • Re: Constrast loss due to sheer light gathering & not C.O., Brian Tung
    • Re: Constrast loss due to sheer light gathering & not C.O., Watclod
      • Re: Constrast loss due to sheer light gathering & not C.O., Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Constrast loss due to sheer light gathering & not C.O., Brian Tung
  • Re: Constrast loss due to sheer light gathering & not C.O., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Constrast loss due to sheer light gather