Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- From: "Ed T" <reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:07:06 GMT
"Doink" <skyman102a@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> I'm keeping the big Coulter but I can't handle dragging it out often and
> if seeing isn't great, the results aren't either. I bought the heavy
> Alt/Az Unistar so anything I can lift easily will set up easily so that's
> not an issue. I want clarity. My 8" reflector beats em all----even the
> larger reflectors here because seeing is seldom that great. I hate false
> color. The MAKs seem a bit easier because they are compact but the APOs
> are less "finicky". MAKs have more mechanics and therefore more stuff
> that can misalign or fail. They seem a bit more difficult to cool too.
> I'm considering a Tak 128 or an Intes f/10 7" Deluxe model with the
> cooling fan.
Those are two great scopes you're considering - both would be a joy to use,
so we're discussing the finer points. The Tak has a focal length of 1040mm,
the mak is 1800mm so consider how much you value wide field views. The two
scopes will perform quite similarly: the Mak maybe brighter and the Tak will
have higher contrast. The Tak is big but not heavy, around 20 pounds fully
dressed. The Mak will give you a smaller exit pupil at high powers. In
terms of resolution the FS-128 has a Dawes limit of .9 arc seconds, here it
is seeing limited >90% of the time.
I have an FS-128 right now and I wouldn't trade it for a 7" mak. Why? I
sometimes like to see the big picture - widefields. I like a "natural" view
and I dislike the loss in contrast that a 35% obstruction yields
(diffraction spikes bother me too). I live in the north where cool down IS
a real issue and do a lot of quick sessions lasting only an hour or two, the
refractor plays that game well. That said, I think a good MCT is an
excellent second or third scope. Of course, there are newts and there are
bigger scopes, but to thine own self be true.
Ed T.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- From: Doink
- Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- References:
- APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- From: Doink
- Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- From: AFM
- Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- From: Doink
- APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- Prev by Date: Re: STUNNING image of M51
- Next by Date: Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- Previous by thread: Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- Next by thread: Re: APO or Mak? BE PATIENT please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|