Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Thomas Womack <twomack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Apr 2005 11:07:54 +0100 (BST)
In article <mk8o51hqfkm8o81fmsc00pb0hibstcq809@xxxxxxx>,
Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Just the opposite, you probably have better seeing conditions than I do.
>The better your seeing, the shorter the period available for imaging
>Jupiter (given a peak smearing rate at the equator of 1" every 257
>seconds).
I'd have thought the rotation of Jupiter wasn't _that_ difficult to
model by (OK, paying careful attention to sub-pixels) rotating all the
images back to a reference time; OK, you'll lose a little on the
limbs, and you might need quite careful metrology on the image to get
the region rotated precisely right, but I shouldn't have thought long
exposures of mid-disc regions of Jupiter were entirely impossible.
Am I missing something? I know Jupiter doesn't rotate as a solid body,
but I think that's a second-order effect.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Bill Paxton
- Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- References:
- New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Davoud
- Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Bill Paxton
- Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- From: Chris L Peterson
- New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- Prev by Date: Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- Next by Date: Re: Parkerizing steel parts
- Previous by thread: Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- Next by thread: Re: New "DSI Pro" and Wireless AutoStar from Meade!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|