Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: RichA <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 03:32:10 -0400
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:22:12 +0100, Steve
<steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>RichA wrote:
>
>> True, and the entry level for DSLRs is now 8 megapixels. It's likely
>> that it will be 12 before the year is out and there is every
>> indication that their use in amateur astronomy will continue to grow.
>> Especially since they now seem to be able to control high noise levels
>> previously associated with CCDs and long exposures(the Canon's are
>> CMOS) pretty well.
>
>The last time I looked, the best CMOS imagers are about 5 times noisier
>than the best CCD. Don't know about sensitivity though - the area of
>pixel available for sensing is smaller on CMOS imagers than CCD ones.
>
>Steve
According to one source, the Canon (Sony?)CMOS sensors are better than
the higher end Kodak CCDs when it comes to sensitivity, but I don't
know at what part of the spectrum.
-Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- References:
- Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: RichA
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: Roger Hamlett
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: David Nakamoto
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: RichA
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: RichA
- Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- From: Steve
- Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- Prev by Date: Re: Even The Standard Playing Card Deck Is...EVIL !!!
- Next by Date: Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- Next by thread: Re: Astro CCDs still dragging their pixel feet
- Index(es):