Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?

From: chris.b@xxxxxxx
Date: 21 Apr 2005 00:10:24 -0700

Well after reading the range of opinions on this matter I am now truly
disappointed that I have only ever seen the Division (once) in my 6".
But have never yet seen the slightest suggestion of the Encke Minimum.
;-)

Regards
Chris.B

.

References:
- Encke Minimum in 7"?
  - From: Larry Stedman
- Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?
  - From: David Nakamoto
- Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?
  - From: Howard Lester
- Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?
  - From: Mijo
- Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?
  - From: Brian Tung

Prev by Date: Re: cost of telescopes and optics 1886,1906 till now, better deal ?
Next by Date: Re: Did you see the sun today?
Previous by thread: Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?
Next by thread: Re: Encke Minimum in 7"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: They Werent just rumours, Mike Tyson "inching" closer to porno...
... >No matter what I thought of Chee's opinions, he used to crack me up ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.sport.boxing)
Re: Progress bar updating performance
... Hi Phillip, thanks a lot for your reply. ... As a matter of fact just ... before reading it I did exactly what you said I should: ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ui)
Re: X64 calling convention test issue
... > convetntion test failed as "There is not enough debug information in ... > error no matter how to add these opinions or ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
Re: What is wrong with people? REALLY! OMG
... > After reading the various opinions on these lunatics and the way they ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.med.transcription)
Re: Digital and Wet Darkrooms
... >Thanks for reading all of this. ... >"darkroom" together but I would truly appreciate your thoughts on the ... >matter. ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.photo.darkroom)