Re: slightly OT, but still connected
- From: Tim Auton <tim.auton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:44:11 +0100
"Clayton Doyles" <cd@xxxxxx> wrote:
>"Davoud" <star@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:280420051558511805%star@xxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
>> I think that the noise being made by the religious right is a death
>> rattle. The Universe is not going to magically become 6,000 years old,
>> and they know it.
>
>On the other side of the coin, I don't see any evidence that the universe is
>really billions of years old.
Try looking for some.
Tim
--
May contain traces of nuts.
.
- References:
- slightly OT, but still connected
- From: Pierre Vandevenne
- Re: slightly OT, but still connected
- From: Davoud
- Re: slightly OT, but still connected
- From: Clayton Doyles
- slightly OT, but still connected
- Prev by Date: Re: slightly OT, but still connected
- Next by Date: Re: John Edwards=John Edmund=John Patterson=John Jacobson=John Shuttlebower=Ryan Walters???
- Previous by thread: Re: slightly OT, but still connected
- Next by thread: Re: slightly OT, but still connected
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
