sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Help with Declination Math, Mij Adyaw
• Dead Night in Rosamond, Starlord
• Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Dave Jessie
  • Re: Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Algomeysa2
    • Re: Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Dave Jessie
    • Re: Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Dave Jessie
    • Re: Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Anders Eklöf
  • Re: Heavens-above miscalculated!?, Chris L Peterson
• Amateur astronomy in south-east europe, anteperkovic
• BIG, Mike
• M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Klaatu
  • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, CNJ999
    • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Sam Wormley
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, CLT
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, CLT
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, William McHale
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Dennis Woos
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, CNJ999
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Dennis Woos
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, tony_flanders
      • Re: M31 3X Bigger than Thought, Tom Polakis
• Capacity of a Polaris mount?, Len Philpot
  • Re: Capacity of a Polaris mount?, RichA
    • Re: Capacity of a Polaris mount?, Len Philpot
• Sky Quality Meter, Anthony
  • Re: Sky Quality Meter, gubbenimanen
    • Re: Sky Quality Meter, Anthony
  • Re: Sky Quality Meter, tony_flanders
    • Re: Sky Quality Meter, welch
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, welch
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, welch
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, Dan Mckenna
    • Re: Sky Quality Meter, Tom Polakis
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, welch
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, tony_flanders
      • Re: Sky Quality Meter, Tom Polakis
• Orion 10" Intelliscope?, Jim
  • Re: Orion 10" Intelliscope?, Victor
• Collimation: aiming the secondary, Mac
  • Re: Collimation: aiming the secondary, LarryG
• AURORA WATCH: An ongoing geomagnetic storm could spark auroras tonight, Sam Wormley
  • Re: AURORA WATCH: An ongoing geomagnetic storm could spark auroras tonight, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: AURORA WATCH: An ongoing geomagnetic storm could spark auroras tonight, Mike
• Mirror recoating advise, Steevo
  • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Bob May
  • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Bob May
    • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Steevo
      • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Bob May
  • Re: Mirror recoating advise, Uncle Bob
• Stupid question!, m . silvers
  • Re: Stupid question!, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Stupid question!, Paul Winalski
    • Re: Stupid question!, CeeBee
  • Re: Stupid question!, William Hamblen
    • Re: Stupid question!, apollo4267
• ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 6, Sam Wormley
• Deaths of key people involved with MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS program in NASA/Secret agency/Vatican Nexus, moonlandinghoaxreligious@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Deaths of key people involved with MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS program in NASA/Secret agency/Vatican Nexus, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Deaths of key people involved with MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS program in NASA/Secret agency/Vatican Nexus, Davoud
  • Re: Deaths of key people involved with MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS program in NASA/Secret agency/Vatican Nexus, Wally Anglesea™
  • Re: Deaths of key people involved with MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS program in NASA/Secret agency/Vatican Nexus, MitchAlsup
    • Re: Deaths of key people involved with MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS program in NASA/Secret agency/Vatican Nexus, Chris L Peterson
• Uncle Bob, Doink
  • Re: Uncle Bob, Uncle Bob
• Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, michaelanderson4
  • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, Al Arduengo
  • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, Ed T
    • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, AM
    • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, thad
      • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, Ed T
    • Re: Smithsonian cashes in it's credibility, RichA
• Comet temple 1, Mike
  • Re: Comet temple 1, Wally Anglesea™
    • Re: Comet temple 1, John Savard
    • Re: Comet temple 1, Chris D
      • Re: Comet temple 1, tkuniok
  • Re: Comet temple 1, William Foley
    • Re: Comet temple 1, Mike
      • Re: Comet temple 1, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Comet temple 1, Mike
      • Re: Comet temple 1, William Foley
  • Re: Comet temple 1, John Carruthers
  • Re: Comet temple 1, Uncle Bob
• Good God, Mike
  • Re: Good God, Mike
• no good deed, Starlord
  • Re: no good deed, Uncle Bob
    • Re: no good deed, Starlord
• MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax", moonlandinghoaxreligious@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax", RMOLLISE
    • Re: MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax", Tom Randy
  • Re: MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax", Algomeysa2
• Us and them, Mike
  • Re: Us and them, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Us and them, DT
  • Re: Us and them, Al Patterson
    • Re: Us and them, Marty
    • Re: Us and them, Szaki
      • Re: Us and them, Starlord
      • Re: Us and them, Al Waterston
      • Re: Us and them, Starlord
      • Re: Us and them, Szaki
      • Re: Us and them, Starlord
      • Re: Us and them, Szaki
      • Re: Us and them, Starlord
  • Re: Us and them, md
    • Re: Us and them, chris . b
      • Re: Us and them, Mike
  • Re: Us and them, T.T.
  • Re: Us and them, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Us and them, Mike
  • Re: Us and them, Starlord
    • Re: Us and them, Marty
      • Re: Us and them, defrancis
  • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
    • Re: Us and them, Tim Auton
      • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Us and them, Marty
      • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Us and them, AM
      • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Us and them, Marty
      • Re: Us and them, AM
      • Re: Us and them, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Us and them, AM
      • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Us and them, Dave Jessie
      • Re: Us and them, Wayne Howell
      • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Us and them, Pierre Vandevenne
    • Re: Us and them, Mike
    • Re: Us and them, AM
    • Re: Us and them, Al Waterston
  • Re: Us and them, michaelanderson4
    • Re: Us and them, Mike
      • Re: Us and them, chris . b
      • Re: Us and them, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Us and them, chris . b
      • Re: Us and them, Mike
    • Re: Us and them, Starlord
• AURORA WATCH: Earth is slipping into a solar wind stream, Sam Wormley
  • Re: AURORA WATCH: Earth is slipping into a solar wind stream, Mike
  • Re: AURORA WATCH: Earth is slipping into a solar wind stream, Carsten A. Arnholm
• Is Hubble going to be saved or....., Jim Stacks
  • Re: Is Hubble going to be saved or....., Tim Killian
• pics - today's solar proms, nytecam
• The ISS is not worthless!!!, RichA
  • Re: The ISS is not worthless!!!, Marty
  • Re: The ISS is not worthless!!!, Tim Killian
    • Re: The ISS is not worthless!!!, Hilton Evans
      • Re: The ISS is not worthless!!!, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Re: The ISS is not worthless!!!, Bill Johnson
• 5" or 6" refractor, Dan
  • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, LarryG
    • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Shawn
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Shawn
    • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, David Nakamoto
    • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, LarryG
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Brian Tung
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, LarryG
    • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Mike
  • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Dan Chaffee
    • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, David Nakamoto
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Ed T
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, David Nakamoto
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Dan
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, David Nakamoto
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Dan
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, AM
      • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, William McHale
    • Re: 5" or 6" refractor, Dan
• Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Florian
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Tim Killian
    • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, lal_truckee
      • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Shawn
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Tim Auton
    • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Florian
    • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Florian
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, D&D
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Tom Randy
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, The Hermit
    • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, richard schumacher
      • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, adm
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Florian
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Gareth Slee
    • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Florian
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Harry F . Leopold
  • Re: Mac OSX newsreader suggestions?, Robert L . Starr
• Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
  • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, lal_truckee
    • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, William Hamblen
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, William Hamblen
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Davoud
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Florian
  • Re: Xephem on Mac OSX install question, Tim Auton
• EOS350D FOV?, md
  • Re: EOS350D FOV?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: EOS350D FOV?, md
  • Re: EOS350D FOV?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: EOS350D FOV?, md
• something of real interest, Mike
  • Re: something of real interest, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: something of real interest, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: something of real interest, Mike
      • Re: something of real interest, Michael McCulloch
• Getting Ready, Starlord
  • Re: Getting Ready, Mark F.
    • Re: Getting Ready, Starlord
      • Re: Getting Ready, Starlord
• Astronomical Observatories, astraco
• Portable pier height for C14 & Losmandy Titan, Chuck
• Extrasolar Comets, Magnificent Universe
  • Re: Extrasolar Comets, Tom Randy
    • Re: Extrasolar Comets, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Extrasolar Comets, Brian Tung
• Achromats w/ Matched chromacors YES/NO/MAYBE?, Joe
  • Re: Achromats w/ Matched chromacors YES/NO/MAYBE?, Mean Mr Mustard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Achromats w/ Matched chromacors YES/NO/MAYBE?, Joe
    • Re: Achromats w/ Matched chromacors YES/NO/MAYBE?, CLT
      • Re: Achromats w/ Matched chromacors YES/NO/MAYBE?, Vader
  • Achromats w/ Matched chromacors YES/NO/MAYBE?, Joe
• The Summer Issue of SKYWATCH, RMOLLISE
• Wacky Amalthea (the moon, not minor planet 133)., Uncle Bob
  • Re: Wacky Amalthea (the moon, not minor planet 133)., Mark Gingrich
    • Re: Wacky Amalthea (the moon, not minor planet 133)., Uncle Bob
  • Re: Wacky Amalthea (the moon, not minor planet 133)., Daniele Gasparri
    • Re: Wacky Amalthea (the moon, not minor planet 133)., Bill Becker
    • Re: Wacky Amalthea (the moon, not minor planet 133)., Uncle Bob
• Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
  • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, adm
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Tim Auton
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Tim Auton
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Tim Auton
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, bratislav3162
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, Bob Fields
      • Re: Meade DSI pro versus firewire webcam for planetary use?, RMOLLISE
• interesting optics paper, Pierre Vandevennne
  • Re: interesting optics paper, shneor
    • Re: interesting optics paper, Ed T
    • Re: interesting optics paper, Havriliak
      • Re: interesting optics paper, Pierre Vandevenne
    • Re: interesting optics paper, WA2GUF
• NASA-TV going digital, njrusty
  • Re: NASA-TV going digital, JATO
    • Re: NASA-TV going digital, Jim Shaffer
      • Re: NASA-TV going digital, David G. Nagel
• Relationship between magnitude and distance, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, tony_flanders
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Brian Tung
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, tony_flanders
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Brian Tung
  • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, tony_flanders
    • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Brian Tung
  • Re: Relationship between magnitude and distance, Brian Tung
• Re: Lunar Conjunction with Jupiter, Terry B
• Need Help Picking a Telescope, Michael
  • Re: Need Help Picking a Telescope, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Need Help Picking a Telescope, Michael
      • Re: Need Help Picking a Telescope, Starlord
  • Re: Need Help Picking a Telescope, Professor Peter
  • Re: Need Help Picking a Telescope, LarryG
• New astronomy blog launched, orion94nl
  • Re: New astronomy blog launched, Dell S. Jones
    • Re: New astronomy blog launched, Ed T
      • Re: New astronomy blog launched, Olga
  • Re: New astronomy blog launched, canopus56
• Eyepiece question., Longfellow
  • Re: Eyepiece question., FuzzyLogic
    • Re: Eyepiece question., Longfellow
  • Re: Eyepiece question., Ed T
    • Re: Eyepiece question., William McHale
      • Re: Eyepiece question., Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Eyepiece question., Malcolm Stewart
    • Re: Eyepiece question., Longfellow
    • Re: Eyepiece question., AstroHoney
  • Re: Eyepiece question., Longfellow
  • Re: Eyepiece question., RMOLLISE
    • Re: Eyepiece question., Longfellow
      • Re: Eyepiece question., Tim Auton
      • Re: Eyepiece question., Longfellow
• Stability of Solar System, Randy Ellig
  • Re: Stability of Solar System, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Stability of Solar System, Olga Kulodnai
    • Re: Stability of Solar System, RichA
  • Re: Stability of Solar System, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Stability of Solar System, Wally Anglesea™
    • Re: Stability of Solar System, Havriliak
    • Re: Stability of Solar System, Havriliak
  • Re: Stability of Solar System, Bob May
  • Re: Stability of Solar System, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Stability of Solar System, Olga
  • Re: Stability of Solar System, Tim Killian
    • Re: Stability of Solar System, Martin Brown
• Johnsonian Telescope???, Chameleon
  • Re: Johnsonian Telescope???, ddickers
    • Re: Johnsonian Telescope???, Chameleon
• SCTs are dying ..., Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Randy Roy
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Thomas Swanson
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Szaki
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., jdb_mars
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Chris L Peterson
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Szaki
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., fiona_wojcik
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Terry A Haimann
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Shawn
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Olga Kulodnai
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Starlord
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Geoff
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., tedkord
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Havriliak
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Jim Attfield
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., laura halliday
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., jdb_mars
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., David Nakamoto
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Professor Peter
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Jeffk1965
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Stephen Paul
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., David Nakamoto
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Stephen Paul
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Professor Peter
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Jan Owen
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Havriliak
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Havriliak
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Marty
  • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Briresp@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Jan Owen
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
      • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: SCTs are dying ..., Uncle Bob
• 41 degree north suburban after-dinner targets - June 2005, canopus56
• [Humour]: People actually said these things, Wally Anglesea™
  • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Wally Anglesea™
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, William Foley
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Pat O'Connell
  • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, RMOLLISE
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Brian Tung
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Joerg Glissmann
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Brian Tung
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Stan Jensen
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, AM
  • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, DT
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Howard Lester
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Paul S. Walsh
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Brian Tung
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Shawn
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Marty
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Howard Lester
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Brian Tung
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Howard Lester
  • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, md
    • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Tim Auton
  • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, Thomas Swanson
  • Re: [Humour]: People actually said these things, kmmposting
  • Re: : People actually said these things, Havriliak
• Posted for Jack Troeger: DARK SKY MAGNETIC RIBBON, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Posted for Jack Troeger: DARK SKY MAGNETIC RIBBON, Olga Kulodnai
• William Optics at 2005 RTMC, william optics
• StarTrak website up and running again, Steve Jones
• Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, RichA
  • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Mike
    • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Mike
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Richard Bullock
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Mike
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Mike
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Olga Kulodnai
    • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, MitchAlsup
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, Mike
      • Re: Voyager 1 8.7 billion miles from Sun, William McHale
• Intense solar flares puzzling to observers, RichA
  • Re: Intense solar flares puzzling to observers, Florian
    • Re: Intense solar flares puzzling to observers, Olga Kulodnai
      • Re: Intense solar flares puzzling to observers, Louis
• Pave the way for eyepiece discs?, RichA
• Do you believe?, Jack Kotze
  • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
  • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Do you believe?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do you believe?, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Do you believe?, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Do you believe?, Havriliak
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Do you believe?, Starlord
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do you believe?, AM
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, RichA
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Florian
      • Re: Do you believe?, Bert Hyman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, Florian
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Florian
      • Re: Do you believe?, Uncle Bob
      • Re: Do you believe?, Starlord
      • Re: Do you believe?, AM
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, T.T.
    • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do you believe?, AM
      • Re: Do you believe?, John Damico
      • Re: Do you believe?, thad
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Dave Jessie
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Drew
      • Re: Do you believe?, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
      • Re: Do you believe?, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pat O'Connell
      • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
  • Re: Do you believe?, Tom Kirke
  • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
    • Re: Do you believe?, Kevin M. Vernon
  • Re: Do you believe?, Ioannis
  • Re: Do you believe?, Joe S.
  • Re: Do you believe?, Florian
  • Re: Do you believe?, Starlord
  • Re: Do you believe?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Do you believe?, Longfellow
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do you believe?, Longfellow
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do you believe?, Ioannis
      • Re: Do you believe?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Do you believe?, Ioannis
      • Re: Do you believe?, Longfellow
      • Re: Do you believe?, Brian Tung
  • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
  • Re: Do you believe?, richard schumacher
  • Re: Do you believe?, DT
  • Re: Do you believe?, Jan Owen
  • Re: Do you believe?, lal_truckee
  • Re: Do you believe?, tedkord
  • Re: Do you believe?, Jack Kotze
    • Re: Do you believe?, Erik Schwertzer
    • Re: Do you believe?, Wally Anglesea™
    • Re: Do you believe?, Martin Brown
      • Re: Do you believe?, Ed T
      • Re: Do you believe?, Florian
      • Re: Do you believe?, Ed T
    • Re: Do you believe?, Paul Schlyter
    • Re: Do you believe?, Jack Kotze
      • Re: Do you believe?, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Do you believe?, lal_truckee
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
  • Re: Do you believe?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Do you believe?, Brian Tung
  • Re: Do you believe?, MitchAlsup
  • Re: Do you believe?, Carl D . Smith
    • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, Carl D . Smith
    • Re: Do you believe?, Uwe Schürkamp
      • Re: Do you believe?, Jack Kotze
  • Re: Do you believe?, eyelessgame
    • Re: Do you believe?, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Do you believe?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Do you believe?, Davoud
      • Re: Do you believe?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Do you believe?, Olga Kulodnai
  • Message not available
    • Re: Do you believe?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Do you believe?, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, Martin Brown
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, Stephen Paul
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Do you believe?, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Do you believe?, TTMA2k2
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do you believe?, lal_truckee
• Drive motors, Ed Majden
  • Re: Drive motors, Tim Killian
  • Re: Drive motors, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Drive motors, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Drive motors, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Drive motors, Per Erik Jorde
    • Re: Drive motors, AM
    • Re: Drive motors, lal_truckee
      • Re: Drive motors, Per Erik Jorde
  • Re: Drive motors, Havriliak
    • Re: Drive motors, Roger Hamlett
• Automated backyard observatory, nytecam
  • Re: Automated backyard observatory, jameswilliamjohnson
    • Re: Automated backyard observatory, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, jameswilliamjohnson
    • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Olga Kulodnai
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, JATO
  • Re: Automated backyard observatory, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Automated backyard observatory, md
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, John C
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Too_Many_Tools
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, JATO
      • Re: Automated backyard observatory, njrusty
  • Re: Automated backyard observatory, Martin R. Howell
• Shoemaker got a plaque, RichA
• RTMC Astronomy Expo Schedule and Webcast, Alson Wong
• VIXEN SP/GP MOTORS, Mark Diegel
  • Re: VIXEN SP/GP MOTORS, televuesteve
• Christianity and science, Mike
  • Re: Christianity and science, Uncle Bob
    • Re: Christianity and science, Aristotle
      • Re: Christianity and science, lal_truckee
      • Re: Christianity and science, Davoud
      • Re: Christianity and science, Aristotle
      • Re: Christianity and science, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Christianity and science, lal_truckee
      • Re: Christianity and science, Aristotle
  • Re: Christianity and science, Florian
    • Re: Christianity and science, Ed T
      • Re: Christianity and science, Florian
      • Re: Christianity and science, Chris McMahan
    • Re: Christianity and science, Martin Brown
  • Re: Christianity and science, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Christianity and science, Mike
      • Re: Christianity and science, CLT
      • Re: Christianity and science, Ronny
    • Re: Christianity and science, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Christianity and science, RichA
  • Re: Christianity and science, Aristotle
    • Re: Christianity and science, Mike
      • Re: Christianity and science, Aristotle
      • Re: Christianity and science, lal_truckee
  • Re: Christianity and science, William McHale
    • Re: Christianity and science, Mike
      • Re: Christianity and science, William McHale
    • Re: Christianity and science, Ralph Hertle
      • Re: Christianity and science, Longfellow
      • Re: Christianity and science, William McHale
      • Re: Christianity and science, starburst
      • Re: Christianity and science, William McHale
• Re: Selene Rising, Florian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Selene Rising, Marty
  • Re: Selene Rising, Tom Rankin
  • Re: Selene Rising, Terry B
    • Re: Selene Rising, Harry F . Leopold
• Newbie: Scope opinions sought., Longfellow
  • Re: Newbie: Scope opinions sought., William Foley
  • Re: Newbie: Scope opinions sought., Mark D
  • Re: Newbie: Scope opinions sought., Uncle Bob
  • Re: Newbie: Scope opinions sought., Longfellow
• New RTGUI Release - Improved "Best of Sky", updated NGC data, Robert Sheaffer
  • RE: New RTGUI Release - Improved "Best of Sky", updated NGC data, rok
    • Re: RE: New RTGUI Release - Improved "Best of Sky", updated NGC data, Robert Sheaffer
      • Re: RE: New RTGUI Release - Improved "Best of Sky", updated NGC data, rok
• Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, Siddhartha Jain
  • Re: Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, Siddhartha Jain
  • Re: Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, Davoud
    • Re: Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, Siddhartha Jain
  • Re: Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, Jan Owen
  • Re: Newbie question on contributing to astronomy, MostlyH2O
• Non-mechanical Focuser?, Klaatu
  • Re: Non-mechanical Focuser?, Bert Hyman
  • Re: Non-mechanical Focuser?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Non-mechanical Focuser?, Ronny
    • Re: Non-mechanical Focuser?, Klaatu
      • Re: Non-mechanical Focuser?, Olga Kulodnai
  • Re: Non-mechanical Focuser?, Hilton Evans
• Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, susan16321
  • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Too_Many_Tools
    • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, lal_truckee
  • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Jan Owen
  • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Randy Roy
  • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Bill Meyers
    • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, Bill Meyers
      • Re: Scopebuggy vs. JMI wheeley bars, or other similar - any advice?, susan16321
• TeleVue and Vixen will be at RTMC, Steve D . White
• Lunar observing: Petavius and Western Crisium, orion94nl
• First astro 'scope - advice sought, Jim Attfield
  • Re: First astro 'scope - advice sought, Starlord
    • Re: First astro 'scope - advice sought, Jim Attfield
  • Re: First astro 'scope - advice sought, Joerg Glissmann
    • Re: First astro 'scope - advice sought, Jim Attfield
• Star test of Orion 100mm ED, jpcannavo
  • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Brian Tung
  • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Peter
  • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Jeff
    • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, RichA
  • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, William Hamblen
  • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Dan Chaffee
    • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Brian Tung
      • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Joe
  • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Tim Killian
    • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, William McHale
      • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Mike
      • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Star test of Orion 100mm ED, William McHale
• Help needed in selecting the right refractor, si
  • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, chris . b
    • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, si
  • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, si
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Shawn
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, si
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Shawn
  • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Elleray
  • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, ngc457
    • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Mean Mr Mustard
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, Shawn
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, si
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, orly . andico
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, chris . b
      • Re: Help needed in selecting the right refractor, orly . andico
• Brazilian Govt and NASA UFO agreement..., Orion
• Re: Gamma Virginis - methods, JOHN PAZMINO
• Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Sam Wormley
  • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Drew
    • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Rockett Crawford
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., John Savard
    • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., kbpayh
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Shawn
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Ralph Hertle
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Shawn
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Pat O'Connell
  • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Olga Kulodnai
    • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Tim Auton
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Mike
  • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Ed T
  • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Mike
    • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., John Savard
  • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Tim Killian
    • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Shawn
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Tim Killian
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Pat O'Connell
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Aristotle
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., Pat O'Connell
      • Re: Ann Druyan talks about science, religion..., John Savard
• Re: Telescope Models?, Mark Gingrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Telescope Models?, chris . b
  • Re: Telescope Models?, Terry Bohlsen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Telescope Models?, Gil
      • Re: Telescope Models?, Chloe_yamato
• Looking for Meade 16" SCT Optical Design Info, matt
  • Re: Looking for Meade 16" SCT Optical Design Info, md
• Saw the Solar System Explorer movie last night., Bob May
  • Re: Saw the Solar System Explorer movie last night., Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Saw the Solar System Explorer movie last night., md
• newbie question on collimation, Steve
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, Starlord
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, Pfudrucker
    • Re: newbie question on collimation, Starlord
      • Re: newbie question on collimation, Pfudrucker
      • Re: newbie question on collimation, Starlord
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, Uncle Bob
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, Paul Winalski
    • Re: newbie question on collimation, laura halliday
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, William Foley
    • Re: newbie question on collimation, AM
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, William Hamblen
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, Joe S.
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, LarryG
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, CLT
    • Re: newbie question on collimation, CLT
  • Re: newbie question on collimation, Olga Kulodnai
• Rosamond Report & Scope Review, Starlord
  • Re: Rosamond Report & Scope Review, Uncle Bob
• Re: BOYCOTT Liberals & TRIGGER the Nuclear Option!, Jim Attfield
  • Re: BOYCOTT Liberals & TRIGGER the Nuclear Option!, Davoud
• how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, Barry Maxwell
  • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, David Nakamoto
  • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, William Hamblen
  • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, canopus56
  • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, canopus56
    • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, William Hamblen
      • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, canopus56
  • Re: how much is the magnification of my barlow increased?, canopus56
• Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Orion
  • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Eric
  • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Dark Guardian
    • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Hilton Evans
      • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Bob May
  • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, allisonki
    • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Tom Polakis
      • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Tim Killian
  • Re: Voyage to the Planets and beyond... Discovery Channel, Olga Kulodnai
• The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, kbpayh
  • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Marty
    • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, guid0
    • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Uncle Bob
    • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, kbpayh
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Uncle Bob
    • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Orion
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, chris . b
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Marty
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, kbpayh
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Hari Seldon
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Elleray
      • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, chris . b
  • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: The Young and the Loaded -- Astronomer Version, md
• They should prevent this kind of advertising, RichA
  • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, RichA
    • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, David Nakamoto
  • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, Olga Kulodnai
    • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, RichA
      • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, Olga
      • Re: They should prevent this kind of advertising, William Foley
• Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Ed Majden
  • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Chloe_yamato
  • Message not available
    • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Ed Majden
  • Message not available
    • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Ed Majden
  • Message not available
    • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Brian Tung
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Brian Tung
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Martin Brown
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, eawckyegcy
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Ed Majden
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, matt
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Image Intensifier Export Restrictions, Ed Majden
• NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, RichA
  • Message not available
    • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, David Nakamoto
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: NASA, astronaut quest, JOHN PAZMINO
  • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, PaulCsouls
    • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, RichA
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, Drew
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, PaulCsouls
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, RichA
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, PaulCsouls
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, RichA
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, PaulCsouls
  • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, Tim Killian
    • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, David Nakamoto
  • Re: NASA, astronaut question value of ISS, Sam Wormley
• The view from light polluted Queens, NY, Buck
  • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, Hilton
    • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, Buck
  • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
    • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, Buck
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
      • Re: The view from light p, JOHN PAZMINO
  • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, tony_flanders
    • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, tony_flanders
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, offaxis2
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, dk
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, Tom Polakis
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, Tom Polakis
      • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, CNJ999
    • Re: The view from light p, JOHN PAZMINO
      • Re: The view from light p, allisonki
      • Re: The view from light p, CNJ999
      • Re: The view from light p, Brian Tung
    • Re: The view from light polluted Queens, NY, shneor
• Astro shops in Boston?, Beta Persei
  • Re: Astro shops in Boston?, Paul Winalski
    • Re: Astro shops in Boston?, Peter Bealo
  • Re: Astro shops in Boston?, Beta Persei
  • Re: Astro shops in Boston?, JOHN PAZMINO
• Rocket Launch, Starlord
  • Re: Rocket Launch, Robin Wier
    • Re: Rocket Launch, Robin Wier
    • Re: Rocket Launch, Starlord
• Re: Galloway BURIES himself, Drew
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Galloway BURIES himself, Jim Attfield
• Nightfall, Marty
  • Re: Nightfall, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Nightfall, Les Blalock
  • Re: Nightfall, tony_flanders
  • Re: Nightfall, Gareth Slee
    • Re: Nightfall, Marty
      • Re: Nightfall, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Nightfall, Marty
      • Re: Nightfall, Gareth Slee
      • Re: Nightfall, Marty
      • Re: Nightfall, Gareth Slee
  • Re: Nightfall, geraldkelleher
• Mars orbiter shoots other orbiter, RichA
  • Re: Mars orbiter shoots other orbiter, Shawn
    • Re: Mars orbiter shoots other orbiter, Marty
• MGS Sees Mars Odyssey and Mars Express, Linus Das
• Meade repair turnaround time, craig510a3
  • Re: Meade repair turnaround time, Bob Liesenfeld
    • Re: Meade repair turnaround time, Skylook123
• Taking it to the limit... again., Ernie Dunbar
  • Re: Taking it to the limit... again., Brian Tung
  • Re: Taking it to the limit... again., thanatos
    • Re: Taking it to the limit... again., hhickam
• WILLIAM OPTICS, william optics
  • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, hop56
    • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, william optics
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, Starlord
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, Tom_T
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, lal_truckee
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, Tom_T
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, Gary
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, william optics
      • Re: WILLIAM OPTICS, Mike Jones
• does aries-instruments have a website?, Chloe_yamato
  • Message not available
    • Re: does aries-instruments have a website?, Chloe_yamato
      • Re: does aries-instruments have a website?, Vader
      • Re: does aries-instruments have a website?, Chloe_yamato
      • Re: does aries-instruments have a website?, Vader
  • Re: does aries-instruments have a website?, Ed T
  • Re: does aries-instruments have a website?, Ronny
• Experimental equipment suplies, John Carruthers
• Virtual Moon Atlas's "minimum instrument" recommendation, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Virtual Moon Atlas's "minimum instrument" recommendation, William Hamblen
• Re: help, Shawn
• New images and your opinions, Daniele Gasparri
  • Re: New images and your opinions, Dan
  • Re: New images and your opinions, John Damico
• Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Havriliak
  • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, William C. Keel
  • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Havriliak
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Bob May
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Bob May
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Pierre Vandevenne
  • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Bob May
    • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Bob May
  • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Havriliak
    • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Havriliak
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, Bob May
      • Re: Reciprocity failure in CCD cameras, David Nakamoto
• milky way, Dan Moos
  • Re: milky way, Hilton Evans
  • Re: milky way, William Hamblen
  • Re: milky way, geraldkelleher
  • Re: milky way, laura halliday
  • Re: milky way, tony_flanders
  • Re: milky way, canopus56
    • Re: milky way, geraldkelleher
• clear sky map, phwashington
  • Re: clear sky map, Nick Theodorakis
    • Re: clear sky map, phwashington
  • Re: clear sky map, tony_flanders
• Color Balance in M-27, Havriliak
  • Re: Color Balance in M-27, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Color Balance in M-27, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Color Balance in M-27, Havriliak
    • Re: Color Balance in M-27, Stephen Paul
• Announcement - Grand Mesa Star Party, WCAC
• looking for photos, ianstewart555
• Fixed for a price?, oss004
  • Re: Fixed for a price?, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: Fixed for a price?, coolbreeze
    • Re: Fixed for a price?, John Savard
      • Re: Fixed for a price?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Fixed for a price?, Tim Auton
• Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, Tim Auton
    • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, Wally Anglesea™
      • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, Wally Anglesea™
    • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology lectures, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology le, Kaliopa
    • Re: Uncle Bob's Pick of the Day: Online Physics/Cosmology le, Uncle Bob
• The Sky at Night with Sir Patrick Moore: Watch it online!, Uncle Bob
  • Re: The Sky at Night with Sir Patrick Moore: Watch it online!, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: The Sky at Night with Sir Patrick Moore: Watch it online!, Uncle Bob
    • Re: The Sky at Night with Sir Patrick Moore: Watch it online!, Vernon
    • Re: The Sky at Night with Sir Patrick Moore: Watch it online!, Tim Auton
      • Re: The Sky at Night with Sir Patrick Moore: Watch it online!, Larry Stedman
• 59 days until impact..., RichA
• More Potential Aurora this week, Sam Wormley
  • Re: More Potential Aurora this week, RichA
• Wha Canis Minor Zodiacal?, http://neodruid.tk
  • Re: Wha Canis Minor Zodiacal?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Wha Canis Minor Zodiacal?, Paul Schlyter
• Where are the images of Toutatis fly-by?, anteperkovic
• Making a focuser - questions:, jtaylor
  • Re: Making a focuser - questions:, LarryG
• Re: The world is really unstable these days......, Uncle Bob
  • Re: The world is really unstable these days......, chris . b
    • Re: The world is really unstable these days......, Uncle Bob
      • Re: The world is really unstable these days......, chris . b
  • Re: The world is really unstable these days......, John Savard
• Re: Do you reviewed the RCX 400 ?, Vader
  • Re: Do you reviewed the RCX 400 ?, Luca
  • Re: Do you reviewed the RCX 400 ?, CLT
    • Re: Do you reviewed the RCX 400 ?, Vader
      • Re: Do you reviewed the RCX 400 ?