Re: That is a big sunspot!


"Chris L Peterson" <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kqba71dv7drb8k25dia58n6e3j3bcpolc5@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sun, 1 May 2005 12:07:41 -0600, "Bill Becker" <bbe51@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>I've been thinking about getting the Meade LPI but I see it requires 2.0
>>USB. I've got 3 USBs on my laptop but.... and don't laugh.... how the heck
>>do you find out what version they are??
>
> Does it really require USB2? I've never yet seen a USB2 device that
> wouldn't work with USB1.1, just slower (that backward compatibility is a
> requirement for the USB logo). The LPI system minimum requirements even
> list Windows 98SE, which has no native support for USB2. Other Meade
> USB2 products (like the DSI) work fine with USB1.1.
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> Chris L Peterson
> Cloudbait Observatory
> http://www.cloudbait.com
Sorry, I meant that I was thinking about getting the Meade DSI and I read
the review of it on Astromart:
http://www.astromart.com/articles/article.asp?article_id=210

Best regards,
Bill


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JIT Debugger
    ... I am using a Meade LPI camera on a Meade telescope with ... Vista also to make it work. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance)
  • Mac Pro and Parallels
    ... I have been a Meade LX200 Telescope user for 12 years. ... the Meade LPI. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: That is a big sunspot!
    ... >I've been thinking about getting the Meade LPI but I see it requires 2.0 ... Does it really require USB2? ... The LPI system minimum requirements even ... USB2 products work fine with USB1.1. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)