Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon <Klazmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 May 2005 14:45:21 +1200
geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote in news:1115128151.686491.185970
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
> "But such information will probably be of little use or interest to the
> archaeologist unless it serves to amplify some historical or cultural
> detail. An astronomer may not understand why his information fails to
> produce excitement because he does not fully grasp that archaeology is
> a social science. Few astronomers have the training to completely
> understand that distinction. The astronomer will generally fail to
> consider how little value an isolated astronomical fact may have to an
> archaeologist in the absence of a cultural context. The different
> languages of astronomy (a "hard" science) and archaeology (a social
> science) foster a lack of attention on the part of the Egyptology
> community for ideas presented by astronomers."
What on Mars are you babbling about?
Klazmon
>
><SNIP>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: Havriliak
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- References:
- You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: geraldkelleher
- You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- Prev by Date: Re: Venus in the evening
- Next by Date: Re: air spaced optics
- Previous by thread: Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- Next by thread: Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading