Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 4 May 2005 05:43:29 -0700
To Rob
Not even close !.
The sequence 25 - 30 - 36 - 43.2 - 51.84 is not derived by multiplying
the value of the previous term by 1.2 but there is a much more
satifying way with 36 degrees as the central value.
Two of the major proportions with oone umbrella value of 51.84
degrees,no wonder I adore those magnificent ancient people for their
economy in representing how line and circle incorporate all shapes yet
are conditioned by the Phi proportion.
Only the horrible sterile minds of contemporaries never can admire the
harmong but then again such is the intent of the original builders.It
shows in how they look at the great insights of Copernicus and
kepler,in the grudging recognition of the ancient priests and for
living people who suffer the loss of the astronomical tradition that
stretches back to remote antiquity.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: Craig
- We are cataloguers
- From: Marty
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- References:
- You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: Tom Kirke
- Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- From: Rob Johnson
- You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- Prev by Date: Re: For God's sake!!
- Next by Date: Re: For God's sake!!
- Previous by thread: Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers
- Next by thread: We are cataloguers
- Index(es):