Re: You are cataloguers,not astronomers

To Craig

This is a matter for cataloguers, mathematical theorists have nothing
whatsoever to do with this matter and they are not required or
qualified to comment,up to and including Newtonian disciples.

In was a cataloguing mistake that led to the later mess and without the
correct relationship between axial and orbital motion,astronomy as a
pursuit is dead and any subsequent endeavor where the axial and orbital
motions are required.

Newton ,the poor bugger,should not have trusted Flamsteed for he was a
cataloguer,not an astronomer like Copernicus,Kepler or Roemer.You
should be jumping for joy,apart from that good attempt by David,the
rest are willing slaves of Baez and his theorist colleagues because
they cannot tell the difference between astronomical modelling and
cataloguing positions of stars and planets beased on a celestial
sphere.

The poor theorists,what would they do without cataloguers,not the other
way around,Get used to it.

.