Re: tak quality SCT?
- From: RichA <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:03:37 -0400
On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:13:45 GMT, "Ed T" <reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"RichA" <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> I'd go measure the wavefronts in a few Tak refractors (modern ones)
>> before thinking SCTs aren't as good optically.
>> -Rich
>
>Why? Have you seen a lemon?
>
>Ed T.
>
No lemons, but don't expect 1/10th wave like an AP refractor.
-Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tak quality SCT?
- From: Rank Amateur
- Re: tak quality SCT?
- References:
- tak quality SCT?
- From: alan_tolmek
- Re: tak quality SCT?
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: tak quality SCT?
- From: William McHale
- Re: tak quality SCT?
- From: RichA
- Re: tak quality SCT?
- From: Ed T
- tak quality SCT?
- Prev by Date: Re: More Financing for Shuttle and Hubble as Space Agency Revises Its Budget
- Next by Date: Re: tak quality SCT?
- Previous by thread: Re: tak quality SCT?
- Next by thread: Re: tak quality SCT?
- Index(es):