Re: Do you believe?
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 14:12:40 GMT
On Wed, 25 May 2005 06:27:24 GMT, "Erik Schwertzer" <erik@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
>When backed into a corner as I have been forced to throughout this thread, I
>do. If Chris P or Davoud hadn't responded offensively to this thread, then
>I would not have responded. Just as they find any religious discussion
>offensive, so do I find their demonic comments offensive. So, they're
>supposed to be able to fling feces at the rest of us and not expect a
>response? Not as long as I read this group. One could say "filter them
>out" but undoubtedly their comments will appear in someone's unfiltered
>response.
You are totally missing my point. I don't find religious discussion (or
religion in general) offensive (although I find it out of place on a
science newsgroup). What I find offensive is anti-science on a science
newsgroup. Religion is not anti-science- it is a philosophical belief
system based on faith, whereas science is based on testability. The two
are not mutually exclusive. Creationism, however, is anti-science.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- References:
- Do you believe?
- From: Jack Kotze
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Erik Schwertzer
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Wally Anglesea™
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Erik Schwertzer
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Michael McCulloch
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Erik Schwertzer
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Michael McCulloch
- Re: Do you believe?
- From: Erik Schwertzer
- Do you believe?
- Prev by Date: Re: Do you believe?
- Next by Date: Re: Do you believe?
- Previous by thread: Re: Do you believe?
- Next by thread: Re: Do you believe?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|