Re: Sky Quality Meter
- From: Dan Mckenna <dmckenna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:13:19 -0700
Yes, the FOV problem can be solved with a fast lens. I am using a 24 mm dia 18 mm fl lens that produces a 10 degree FOV and on another meter a lens that produces a 3 degree FOV.
The count rate remains near the level of a wide open detector.
Doug, did you calibrate this to Vj magnitude or measure sky brightness
with the cm500 and standard stars. It seems that between this meter and the one we are developing we have a new system, Si+Cm500, that will need
to be worked up in a peer review process.
I will do CM500 filtered CCD exposures of standard fields to calibrate this system. Have you done comparisons with Vj photometry ?
Dan
welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Tony,
The sensor is on the (front) side with the display (which is off during measurement, of course!)
You are no doubt aware that there is a trade-off between total signal and solid angle. Indeed the cone half-angle of 40 degrees will weight the reading off the zenith, but it is representative of a near-zenith sky brightness. The actually weighting with altitude would make the "effective altitude" closer to 60 degrees since the sensor response is lower at angles farther from the zenith.
Cheers, Doug Welch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sky Quality Meter
- From: welch
- Re: Sky Quality Meter
- References:
- Sky Quality Meter
- From: Anthony
- Re: Sky Quality Meter
- From: tony_flanders
- Re: Sky Quality Meter
- From: welch
- Sky Quality Meter
- Prev by Date: Re: Comet temple 1
- Next by Date: Re: Sky Quality Meter
- Previous by thread: Re: Sky Quality Meter
- Next by thread: Re: Sky Quality Meter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|