Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: "David Nakamoto" <res07oeg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:18:58 GMT
I thought OS X was based on Unix, which is pretty stable, but also is not that
secure, and I believe the "resistance to security breaches" is due mainly to the
fact that most hackers are targeting Windows system because 90% of the computers
out there are running them. If you're going to get "enjoyment" out of wrecking
computer systems, the more systems the merrier for you.
--- Dave
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinprick holes in a colorless sky
Let inspired figures of light pass by
The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns
Challenges infinity, and is soon gone
david.nakamoto@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Sean Golden" <seangolden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:AP2dnZ9_S9G5cTzfRVn-tA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I run both XP and OSX on multiple computers. OS X is far more stable. It's
>not even remotely a contest. OS X also is far more resistent to security
>breaches, again, not even a contest.
>
> So why do I run XP at all?
>
> Because Mac software is either nonexistent, overpriced or feature-thin.
>
> -sdg
>
> "David Nakamoto" <res07oeg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:S9doe.5127$_w.1611@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>I don't know. OS X seems stable enough. While I personally find that Windows
>>XP works fairly stable, OS X I've heard runs even more rock steady, but here
>>I'm going to hearsay.
>>
>> On the other hand, if such a port were to happen and the number of PCs
>> running it were to reach a certain number, then all the nut cases out there
>> would start writing more viruses and other stuff for OS X. Perhaps that will
>> tell us how stable OS X really is.
>>
>> It's just another possible development. We'll have to wait and see.
>>
>> --- Dave
>> --
>>
>>
>> "Chris L Peterson" <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:cfg2a1tm9agbu16rb06vau7idg5fg20326@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:40:28 -0400, RichA <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://news.com.com/Apple+to+ditch+IBM%2C+switch+to+Intel+chips/2100-1006_3-5731398.html?tag=nefd.lede
>>>>
>>>>They should have gone with AMD.
>>>
>>> Intel invented the uP, and continues to be the force behind most of the
>>> innovation. AMD is just a copycat. Intel is one of the truly great tech
>>> companies.
>>>
>>> If this story is true (and it's been suggested before) it could mark a
>>> turnaround for Apple. The bottom line is that Apple barely treads water
>>> as a computer company. They have a pitiful market share, and there's no
>>> sign that's going to change. But switching to an x86 architecture will
>>> force them to port their OS to that platform. That opens up the
>>> possibility of running OS X on ordinary PCs. Not something I'm looking
>>> for, but it could open up a huge new market for Apple, and really put
>>> some juice back in the OS wars (which everyone will benefit from).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Starlord
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- References:
- Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: RichA
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: David Nakamoto
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Sean Golden
- Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Prev by Date: Re: Canon's new astrophoto DSLR announced [ 4x5" FILM option? ]
- Next by Date: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|