Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
John Steinberg <seesig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:040620050734550393%seesig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> x86? Puhlease! Wrong endian and slower performance. Itanium? It
We've gone through this before ;-) If Apple is going x86, the main reason
will be performance. But lets not start a flame war and wait an see.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Programming PowerPC on Mac
... Apple themselves make Apples while hundreds of companies _SHARE_ the x86 PC ... Which, in light of what I've been saying above, is actually more strange, ... BUT when it comes to documentation and "developer kits" and such, ...
(alt.lang.asm) - Re: Saw 10.4.1 Running On a PC Laptop Today
... >>> Mac, and Apple would be out of the hardware industry. ... > And the "big deal" is that an X86 Mac is not ...
(comp.sys.mac.advocacy) - Re: Apple with its own Chips....
... choice of competing companies to buy from. ... did for a while a few years ago) Apple can switch to AMD. ... And using the x86 allows companies like Adobe to ... have common low-level code for Windows and Macs. ...
(uk.comp.sys.mac) - Re: opengl
... Except, I thought I heard a few years back, that Apple and MicroSquash were semi partners in some mannor or another? ... Almost all CAD programs are OpenGL and doing something like this essentially guarantees Vista/Longhorn is a non-starter with them. ... will essentially run on any x86 machine but Apple is putting a hardware key into their x86 Macs so x86 OSX will only install and run on them. ... several developers have installed VMware on their x86 Macs and found Windows 2000 and WindowsXP will install and multiple boot on them just fine with almost no speed penalty. ...
(comp.graphics.apps.lightwave) - Re: So, now that Vista is finally shipped.
... Apple made a lot of money from iPods and PCs. ... They didn't change the mac into what used to be its rival, ... based on CPUs other than the x86 series from Intel. ... Apple may never reach the profits of Microsoft. ...
(comp.sys.mac.advocacy) |
|
