Re: Canon's new astrophoto DSLR announced [ 4x5" FILM option? ]


> Sure, general point accepted, but while you use your 17-35mm F2.8L at
> $1400 I can use my 11-22mm at $750 which at 6mm shorter and same
> aperture at 11mm should, by your reasoning, be more expensive but it
> is not :-)

I'm not sure why you keep mentioning a discontinued lens from Canon when the
current model is the 16-35 f2.8 which can be had for $1350 and if that is
too expensive you can always buy the 17-40 f4 for $660, there are also some
very good full frame wideangle zoom lenses from 3rd party suppliers like
Sigma and Tamron which are much less expensive still.

Rob.



.

Relevant Pages