Re: Canon's new astrophoto DSLR announced [ 4x5" FILM option? ]


> Sure, general point accepted, but while you use your 17-35mm F2.8L at
> $1400 I can use my 11-22mm at $750 which at 6mm shorter and same
> aperture at 11mm should, by your reasoning, be more expensive but it
> is not :-)

I'm not sure why you keep mentioning a discontinued lens from Canon when the
current model is the 16-35 f2.8 which can be had for $1350 and if that is
too expensive you can always buy the 17-40 f4 for $660, there are also some
very good full frame wideangle zoom lenses from 3rd party suppliers like
Sigma and Tamron which are much less expensive still.

Rob.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HAY Ratch, where is your objective criterion of evidence ?
    ... make even more mistakes in his reasoning, he can do it perfectly well ... Rob was a little left, was into Linux and appeared to have grown ... to cut down on his zealotry and use the forum for what they were ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Spoiler - Darkly Dreaming Dexter
    ... > exactly what my reasoning was... ... Yeah, ... Cathy ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: Poor old Rob Candlish
    ... Rob, so unless you can prove that someone else created the page ... the buck stops with Mr Candlish. ... A rather twisted line of reasoning, but then this is URN so perhaps I ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: [=SDC=] Q60. "One for the... Brits".
    ... You're on the cusp. ... What's your reasoning? ... Adrian ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Telescope magnification question
    ... answer this question from an astronomy course and explain the reasoning. ... A telescope has an aperture of 8", objective focal length of 80" and a 1/2" focal length eyepiece. ...
    (uk.sci.astronomy)