Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:33:28 GMT
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 09:43:07 -0400, John Steinberg <seesig@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John-
I'm honored that you have gone to such trouble to archive my posts! <g>
But a few comments:
>1). He repeatedly stated Photoshop development was done on Win and
> ported to Macs...
Not quite true. During _one_ discussion, I passed on the word of a
friend of mine at Adobe that they were discussing not porting future
versions of Photoshop to the Mac.
>2). Chris has stated there are OS X exploits and even offered to write
> one for Davoud...
Not quite true. I referenced an exploit that had been identified but not
found in the wild. I also said that it was possible to write malicious
software for any machine if you could convince someone to actually run
the code. You disagree with that?
>3). Chris has derided the OS X interface. Come on now! He also stated
> he found his Mac so ugly he left it hidden. Leading me to
> conclude he must own a B/W Mac, which *is* ugly, and
> old.
True, I dislike the OS X interface. I also dislike much of Apple's
industrial design (the iPod looks nice, although I don't have one for
other reasons than appearances). I don't see what my personal sense of
aesthetics has to do with anything here, though. Do you want to discuss
art and music, while we're at it?
>4). Chris mentions, as regularly as this topic rears its ugly head,
> that he converted a large central Colorado prepress(?) house from
> Macs to PCs. The anecdote is so tired and silly I become
> narcoleptic when seeing it repeated ad nauseam.
Anecdote? I've acted as a consultant to two companies who made that
switch, and am now working with a third that is looking at its options.
I've got to do something to help pay for all that telescope equipment.
>5). Chris repeats Apple's "tiny shrinking marketshare" mantra often,
> forgetting or unaware that Apple is still an enormous company
> (800x the size of Meade, for example) with healthy profits and
> and a huge cash reserve.
I never said that Apple wasn't large. But I don't really see them going
anywhere with their computers. I don't see them as a well run company
(in spite of their current profitability). But that's just my take on
how a company should operate. Again, there is nothing right or wrong
here, just personal viewpoints.
>6). Chris states he is an ADC member (as am I), but also repeatedly
> states the Mac market isn't large enough to justify development
> for it.
Not true. I've said that the small size of the Mac market is a fair
reason for a company to choose not to develop its products for it. That
isn't quite the same thing. I do some development for Macs because I
have a customer willing to pay for it.
>The gentlemanly tack in an argument of this nature is to shake hands
>and say both sides are correct. However, it would also serve Chris
>well to acknowledge his misstatements of factual matters...
Note my comments above.
> and further,
>not to pretend he's platform agnostic when the record shows he's
>anything but.
That depends on what you mean by "platform agnostic". Certainly, my
personal tastes run to Intel hardware and Windows software. I also have
what I consider to be good, rational reasons for believing that this
platform is generally superior to others. However, I don't have a
problem with other people seeing things differently. I know that in
terms of actual capability, there is very little difference between a
modern Windows PC, Linux PC, Unix workstation, or Mac. The main reasons
to choose between them have to do with other things: design, UI,
available software, support, etc. Consequently, it doesn't bother me if
someone uses something other than Windows. To me, that doesn't make them
stupid or foolish. I assume they have their own good reason for using
the hardware and software they do, and that it works for them.
>Davoud might tone down his rhetoric for a bit more
>domestic tranquility but this is Usenet after all, and fur will fly.
Which was the point of my post: to ask Davoud to listen to what he is
actually saying, and realize that it damages his credibility. To me, his
extreme defensiveness about Macs comes across as a lack of confidence (I
see the same thing in those who are highly defensive of other
platforms).
This isn't a Mac vs PC discussion (at least on my part).
>Having said all this, I sincerely respect and like Chris. The depth
>and breadth of his knowledge on a very wide range of technical topics
>makes him a must read. But like all of us, he is not immune to bias and
>error. I like and respect Davoud, too. His range of knowledge is
>quite extraordinary and I suspect he and Chris would get along quite
>famously in person.
I don't doubt it. I like Davoud (as an Internet friend) and would enjoy
meeting him in person. And I would say the same for you. We share a huge
range of interests (and opinions on matters social and political).
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Davoud
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- References:
- Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: RichA
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Davoud
- Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- From: Brian Tung
- Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Prev by Date: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Next by Date: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Computer sides with Satan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|