Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: RichA <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:39:51 -0400
On 13 Jun 2005 14:56:15 -0700, chris.b@xxxxxxx wrote:
>A sensible approach Chris
>
>I was using the term "enviro-nut" in the context of Rich's post. Of
>course I meant "environmentalist" in the generally accepted meaning of
>the word. Though even here there are so many variations of committment
>to the cause of caring for the environment and so many possible ways of
>lowering one's own impact on this earth that the term is so broad as to
>be virtually meaningless.
>
>
>Allan
>
>As to clean energy production I prefer wind turbines.
So do alot of urban elitist yuppie liberals.
Until they start spoiling the view from their
property, then it's LAWSUIT time!
-Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: Bob Schmall
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: chris . b
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- References:
- Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: RichA
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: chris . b
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: chris . b
- Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- Prev by Date: Re: Grand Canyon Star Party 2005 - Long
- Next by Date: Re: New 80mm triplet refractors from Apogee Inc
- Previous by thread: Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- Next by thread: Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|