Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: Bob Schmall <rschmall@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:59:45 GMT
RichA wrote:
On 13 Jun 2005 14:56:15 -0700, chris.b@xxxxxxx wrote:
A sensible approach Chris
I was using the term "enviro-nut" in the context of Rich's post. Of course I meant "environmentalist" in the generally accepted meaning of the word. Though even here there are so many variations of committment to the cause of caring for the environment and so many possible ways of lowering one's own impact on this earth that the term is so broad as to be virtually meaningless.
Allan
As to clean energy production I prefer wind turbines.
So do alot of urban elitist yuppie liberals. Until they start spoiling the view from their property, then it's LAWSUIT time! -Rich
Do you EVER think in anything but stereotypes? .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: RichA
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- References:
- Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: RichA
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: chris . b
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: chris . b
- Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- From: RichA
- Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- Prev by Date: Re: New 80mm triplet refractors from Apogee Inc
- Next by Date: Re: Astro webcams on Macs
- Previous by thread: Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- Next by thread: Re: Enviro-looneys versus "Chemcam"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|