Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Jun 2005 10:32:25 -0700
The opposite to independent motions (axial and orbital) in this case is
combined motion and unfortunately you lapsed from a technical argument
of axial rotation generating dawn,noon,dusk ,dawn.. as a cyclical
occurence to a useless linguistic point on dependency and
interdependency.
I do not forget that I am handling the exquisite Equation of Time
principles from people who sorted ,sifted and refined the technical
material through civilisation after civilisation until they were
mangled by the same linguistic fireworks that imitates Newtonian
perspectives.
There is one value for axial rotation as an independent motion and our
ancestors,using the Equation of Time principles ,effectively applied
these principles to the development of the pace of equable
hours,minutes and seconds and correspondingly the axial rotation of the
Earth.
The departure from technical points to linguistic manipulations is as
far as I could go and you are free to live out your life following the
cartoon anti-astronomy relativistic concept based on H.G. Well's
'Time Machine' ,much of which in turn is based on Newton's destruction
of the relationship between axial and orbital motion through the use of
the sidereal justification.
"'Really this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some
people who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It
is only another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between
time and any of the three dimensions of space except that our
consciousness moves along it."
http://www.bartleby.com/1000/1.html
I could not stomach living with an explanation of the cosmos made by a
H.G. Wells fictional character as a means to an end for the purpose
of a fictional story in a 19th century era where they thought they
could build machines for everything.Every time you justify the rotation
of the Earth as 23 hours 56 mon 04 sec you are maintaining the cartoon
universe of Newtonian/relativistic speculative theorists.
Do you still think you have a choice in designating two values for
axial rotation through 360 degrees ?.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- References:
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: DT
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Tim Auton
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- Prev by Date: Re: Who?
- Next by Date: Spiders Blowing in the Winds!
- Previous by thread: Re: accruate "sundials"
- Next by thread: Re: accruate "sundials"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|