Re: Dance opf The Planets - New mailing-list

To Rod

Perturbations did not exist within the astronomical method before
Newton insofar as the anomalous behavior of the motions of planets
such as retrograde motion or Io's anomalous motion have heliocentric
geometric solutions ,the former as the changing orbital speeds of Earth
and Mars or the latter,the changing orbital distances between Earth and
Jupiter. -

http://r2d2.stcloudstate.edu/~womack/astr/models/retropicmars.jpg

Kepler observed the motion of Mars against the background stars in an
18 year period from a perspective of the motion of the Earth ( Panis
Quadragesimalis) and not as Newton has it as mean Sun/Earth distances
against a celestial sphere.

"That the fixed stars being at rest, the periodic times of the five
primary planets, and (whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the
earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean
distances from the sun." Isaac

http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/phaenomena.htm

"The proportion existing between the periodic times of any two planets
is exactly the sesquiplicate proportion of the mean distances of the
orbits, or as generally given,the squares of the periodic times are
proportional to the cubes of the mean distances." Kepler


I would dearly love to show you the Panis Quadragesimalis of Kepler to
illustrate the point or the Newtonian error but the most famous
astronomical representation of the motion of Mars seen from Earth from
the book Astronomia Nova does not exist on the entire internet.You can
note the difference between Kepler's perspective and Newton's but the
chances are you would spindoctor Newton or make a silly one line insult
directed towards me.

Huge shortcuts were taken by Newton and whether you care or not,the
result of the obvious shortcut was the catastrophic introduction of
the anti-astronomical framehopping -

"That the fixed stars being at rest, the periodic times of the five
primary planets, and (whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the
earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean
distances from the sun.

This proportion, first observed by Kepler, is now received by all
astronomers; for the periodic times are the same, and the dimensions of
the orbits are the same, whether the sun revolves about the earth, or
the earth about the sun. And as to the measures of the periodic times,
all astronomers are agreed about them."

That is a big bright shining Newtonian lie for Kepler wrote this -

". . . the ancient hypotheses clearly fail to account for certain
important matters. For example, they do not comprehend the causes of
the numbers, extents and durations of the retrogradations and of their
agreeing so well with the position and mean motion of the sun.
Copernicus alone gives an explanation to those things that provoke
astonishment among other astronomers, thus destroying the source of
astonishment, which lies in the ignorance of the causes." 1596,
Mysterium Cosmographicum

This is why you cannot fit this Newtonian monstrosity (which destroys
the astronomical relationship between axial and orbital motion) -

http://astrosun2.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro201/images/sidereal_day.gif

Into Keplerian this insight on planetary motion and especially the
second law (designated as a law by Newtonian disciples to suit their
ballistic agenda) -

http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/astronomy/fix/student/images/04f15.jpg

Teaching people to use a telescope is a worthwhile pursuit and I have
never said otherwise, but it is far from being astronomy yet you call
yourselves astronomers when it is unwarranted at present.I am sorry
that you do not comprehend the garbage of Newton as he goes about
maneuvering astronomical terms for his purpose but they are ultimately
insincere and unethical under scrutiny.The most obvious error is the
destruction of the relationship between axial and orbital motion or
what amounts to the same thing - the adoption of 23 hours 56 min 04 sec
for axial rotation and astronomical sidereal justification.It is an
enormous lapse of reasoning,where Hooke pulled Newton up on his
previous errors,Newton made sure he was ambiguous enough to conceal
this chronic error.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This is for Kepler
    ... the heliocentric faster Earth taking an inner orbital circuit.The toys ... >>stationary Earth but an orbitally motion Earth. ... Newton was a peevish freak who cared little for the exquisite reasoning ... If you feel the need to travel to the Sun to account for retrogrades ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The great Western adaption
    ... that it is impossible to work the annual orbital cycle of the Earth ... orbital motion of the Earth and axial rotation with a system of 3 ... astronomers in the 16th century. ... The 24 hour system correlating with axial rotation with clocks at ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)
    ... >> direct, and to proceed with a motion nearly uniform, that is to say, ... This a noted proposition among astronomers, ... >> A genius cannot tolerate inferiority or insincerity and Newton ... > A novel approach is to determine that Keplerian motion can be derived ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Sourse dependency (for genius only)
    ... > The following astronomical description by Newton is the single greatest ... > Keplerian motion hence the tangle every time contemporaries open their ... This a noted proposition among astronomers, ... A novel approach is to determine that Keplerian motion can be derived ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Isolating the direction of the Earths orbital motion
    ... astronomers correct this inequality for their ... is no such thing as an equable motion, ... earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean ... The changing reference of the daylight/darkness line to the distant ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)