Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ]
- From: Ralph Hertle <ralph.hertle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:58:01 GMT
Sam:
Sam Wormley wrote:
No Center http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
The battle of hydrogen and Euclid's extended lines is on:
The point made by NASA in the article, "uni_101bbtest.html", says that cosmic microwave background radiation was evidence of the BB.
The discoveries of the ESA space vehicle say otherwise: that the cosmic microwave background radiation was caused by the reduction of the energy of photons due to collisions of the photons and hydrogen molecules.
Which scientific claim is right?
Ralph Hertle .
- References:
- Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ]
- From: Ralph Hertle
- Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ]
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ]
- Prev by Date: Re: Compact Stars for Undergraduates
- Next by Date: Re: Tempel 1 impact question one: change
- Previous by thread: Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ]
- Next by thread: Re: The big bang theory [ The Red Shift ]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|