Re: accruate "sundials"





jtaylor wrote:
> <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1119347036.922840.271540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > jtaylor wrote:
> > > <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:1119258271.974598.130540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > > So,frames of reference are little more than pretending to give
> > > > yourselves choices you do not have,
> > >
> > > WHY don't we have these choices?
> > >
> >
> > The axial rotation of the Earth through 360 degrees is an independent
> > event hence the cycle of dawn,noon,dusk,dawn...,
>
> But don't these events depend upon the sun, and so this rotation cannot be
> considered as independent of the sun?

There is very little more I can say other than recycle the whole thing
and you can take comfort that the big institutions share your reasoning
and the same ability to ignore that they choose the wrong value for
axial rotation,either way,as individuals or representative of
cataloguers (NASA,ROG,ect) it is either stupidity or misconduct,no
offense but you display the former.

So,the pre-Copernican equable 24 hour day translates into independent
axial rotation within a Copernican/Keplerian heliocentric framework
using the Equation of Time correction,any other choice(s) is just plain
silly.

It has never happened in the history of humanity that such an error was
allowed to fester and ultimately break out into this horrendous dodging
that I really have no interest in.The geologists are likely to break
first from the sham that originated with Newton for differential
rotation in the mantle generates the Equatorial bulge and subsequently
will replace convections cells as a mechanism for tectonic motion (I am
rightly proud of my insight) thereby linking astronomy with geology for
the first time.

As a teacher I have no need to ask questions but anything that you find
curious please ask and I will help you figure it out.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: accruate "sundials"
    ... > jtaylor wrote: ... >> Isn't there more variation than that - the effects of large planets, ... > maintain the equivalency of axial rotation at 15 degrees per hour is ... > from the sidereal reasoning of Flamsteed/Newton. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: accruate "sundials"
    ... jtaylor wrote: ... maintain the equivalency of axial rotation at 15 degrees per hour is ... from the sidereal reasoning of Flamsteed/Newton. ... planetary motion and it shows in your reply. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: accruate "sundials"
    ... >> jtaylor wrote: ... >> still,you are tying the Earth's axial rotation directly to external ... There is no external reference for independent axial rotation but you ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: accruate "sundials"
    ... >> To JTaylor ... The Earth's axial rotation through 360 degrees is a single event ... of figuring out the translation from the pre-Copernican equable 24 hour ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Dons blog
    ... mechanism that relates orbital motion with axial rotation. ... The geologists also know that the Earth's Equatorial bulge is ... shortcircuit the ability to adjust the mechanism of plate tectonics ... for where themass for expansion comes from. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)

Loading