Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Tim Auton <tim.auton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:10:11 +0100
Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:19:01 +0200, Paul Schlyter <pausch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>Compare this to the same closed and sealed room, where it is impossible
>>to determine if the room is situated in a gravitational field, or if the
>>room is smoothly accelerating.
>
>I've often wondered about the accuracy of this statement. In an
>accelerating room, the force of acceleration is uniform everywhere in
>that room. But how do you create a uniform gravitational field? In
>reality, there will always be a tidal force. The statement that the
>force in an accelerating frame are identical to the force in a frame
>subject to a gravitational field seems only to be true in a limiting
>case (the field produced by a mass at infinity) that isn't physically
>realizable. Or maybe you can create a locally uniform gravitational
>field through some clever superposition of masses?
You can purchase uniform gravity fields at the same place you get your
frictionless pulleys, perfect springs and point masses.
Tim
--
Don't tell me I'm still on that feckin' island!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- References:
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: jtaylor
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: accruate "sundials"
- Prev by Date: Re: accruate "sundials"
- Next by Date: Re: definition of confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: accruate "sundials"
- Next by thread: Re: accruate "sundials"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|