Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact
- From: "Ike" <IKE@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:59:25 GMT
"RichA" <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jrp5c1dvbrbgla0nd0a5ijkelmg0jats10@xxxxxxxxxx
> Even so-called, scientific organizations
> are not immune from it. Check out the term,
> "fireworks" used below. While the term may be
> a somewhat apt metaphor for what the comet is doing,
> it is not the connotation that the public would assign
> to outgassing seen in the Hubble shot. Why must science
> always build up unrealistic expectations in people?
> The facts of the mission are interesting enough without the
> fanfare.
>
ya ...the media could make it totally unimportant..most really don't give a
***. That is the naked truth.
The CBC is the only news organization that handles these things "properly".
The whole idea is to generate
"curiousity" amonst a mostly brain dead society. If the schools can't do
it, the media may as well give it a shot.
.
- References:
- B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact
- From: RichA
- B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact
- Prev by Date: Re: RichA = Troll
- Next by Date: Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact
- Previous by thread: Re: B.S. media hype surrounding Deep Impact
- Next by thread: Galileo explains
- Index(es):