Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"



On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:42:59 +0100, Martin Brown
<|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>There never is 100% proof of anything in science. If you want absolute
>certainty you have to be a mathematician or a religious nutcase.

I think you are mis-stating things a little in this case. Scientific
theories can't be "proven", but the discussion here is about
observations. Observations can be about as conclusive as anything can
get (although they don't have to be).


>It is this lack of absolute proof in science that allows the
>pathological liars in the White House to pretend that global warming is
>"unproven" and the tobacco industry to use very clever legalistic jargon
>to convince Joe six pack that smoking does not cause cancer.

Again, I would separate observation from theory. Global warming is an
observation that can't be refuted by any rational person (which explains
why certain world leaders deny its existence). This is quite different
from using the lack of absolute proof in scientific theories to argue
that warming isn't anthropogenic. While the evidence very strongly
favors that theory, the small amount of remaining doubt can be used by
some to justify their beliefs.

[NOTE: I'm not trying to start a discussion here about global warming!
I'm just using this example to distinguish between observations and
theories- two components of science that are often confused.]

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Al Gores Personal Energy Use
    ... smart-ass sarcasm. ... The science IS in, and it's conclusive to all those ... This is absolute rubbish. ... proof that human activity is having any effect on global warming one ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Ch 4 - The Great Global Warming Swindle
    ... in the programme) is that CO2 has everything to do with global warming. ... One can opt for the herbal, homoeopathic version of science, or the real ... to challenge scientific theories. ... The real mystery is why the program was not titled 'A convenient lie'. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: That crashing sound...
    ... And if you are a vigilant observer of the global warming debate, you know how inconveniently cold it is in the Arctic this winter for Al Gore and his army of climate alarmists. ... Granting a long overdue forum to noted dissenting scientists, economists and policy experts from around the world, the Heartland Institute-sponsored symposium at the Marriott Marquis offered welcomed reasoned analysis as alternative to last December's hysterical circus which was Bali. ... Even before the first mention was made of activists and media misrepresenting current climate science while completely ignoring the serious inaccuracies in virtually all IPCC documents at Sunday's opening dinner, alarmist groups were busy marginalizing the event. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: NBC: An Inconvenient Truth
    ... But it doesn't make sense to assume that the science on the ... Is man caused Global Warming a Scientific fact? ... They think that the man's output of CO2 is causing the climate to grow ... There are many claiming to be "climate scientists". ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: NBC: An Inconvenient Truth
    ... But it doesn't make sense to assume that the science on the ... Is man caused Global Warming a Scientific fact? ... They think that the man's output of CO2 is causing the climate to grow ... There are many claiming to be "climate scientists". ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)

Quantcast