Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:30:46 GMT
On 2 Jul 2005 14:55:20 -0700, "AstroHoney" <lindarvogt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>If observation can "disprove" a theory then what is observation when it
>supports a theory?
It is an observation that supports a theory.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: William C. Keel
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: geraldkelleher
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- References:
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: RichA
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- From: AstroHoney
- Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- Prev by Date: Re: Observing Book?
- Next by Date: Re: Eyepieces and barlow for 14 inch f4.8 Newt/Dob
- Previous by thread: Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- Next by thread: Re: Scientists "reaching" when it comes to "Deep Impact"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
