Re: Get Me Started (again...)



I started with a Dobsonian. I used it for nearly 10 years before moving on
to an SCT. The Dob I had was a 6" size and I later added digital setting
circles which helped greatly. You may find your ideal beginners scope is a
Dob. Check them out at Orion.

Regards,
JK

"Lee Bouknight" <lee_bouknight@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hGWze.36681$ho.13555@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello All
>
> As a kid, I was always looking up. Folks bought me a "cheap" scope from
> Sears and I used it for many years. Had a great time with it, but once I
> went in the U.S.A.F., lost interest. I'm 43 now and my 5.5 year old
> daughter is showing an interest - I'm thinking it's time to get started
> again. I've researched and researched...and now it's time to ask the
folks
> who know (and who don't stand to make any money off me when I ask them!!).
> A few questions if I may....
>
> A few notes first....
> A) I have around $1300-$1500.00 to spend..1500 is on the high side, but
I'll
> swing it if I need to. This, of course, is the limiting factor.
> B) I have a decent general knowledge of the night sky, but while I try to
> decide what to buy, I have a pair of 7x50 binocs I'm playing around with
> (darn hard to track with those things....). So, while I intend to get
> better aquainted, I want GOTO. Kid is very impatient and I don't want her
> to loose interest (yea, sounds like a good excuse, huh??).
> C) Not too worried about the weight - it'll probably never leave my back
> yard.
> D) That said, be aware I'm in a fairly dark area - nearest city of any
size
> is about 35 miles, and only 1 night light within a 1/2 mile of me. Light
> isn't a major issue, but there is a small amount of glow from
Charlotte,NC,
> 38 miles s.sw
>
> With those said, here I go:
> 1) I want decent light-gathering -6-8". Nothing smaller; did that years
> ago.
> 2) I'm looking at a Meade 6 or 8" Schmidt-Newtonian, or possibly a
Celestron
> 6" Schmidt-Cassegrain (it's roughly the same price as the 6" meade...).
> Here I need help. I like the idea of 8" for light. But I'm told that
> there is a bit of distortion or coronal affect at the edge of the fov in a
> S.N scope that's not in the S.C., and to go to an 8" SC breaks my budget.
> Is this VERY apparent and is it really an issue? I like the SC, but I've
> found on some sights that the SC does not gather the light that a
same-size
> SN does. I don't want to loose any significant amount; again, is it
> noticeable and appreciable?
> 3) I don't see any mention of what eyepieces either scope comes with..do
> they come with any at all, or do I buy the extra "kit"? I'm looking at
the
> Meade "deluxe observers kit". It has a 9.7, 15 and 26mm eyepiece - should
> cover what I need. It also has a 2xbarlow, Moon Filter (though it's not
> the variable type I'd LIKE to get) and a Color Filter Kit. Any major
> accessories I'm missing here (as a starter)?
> 4) Although I'm not into photography yet, I might experiment, and the
Meade
> comes with the LPI - what's everyones experience with this? Good for
> planets and moon; what about beyond that?
> 5) Oh, and as far as the XLT/UHTC coatings, do they REALLY work as well as
> the Astronomy magazines and manufacturers say? If so, would a 6" with
> UHTC/XLT give me as much light as an 8" without??
> 6) Can anyone point me to a website that compares Solar filters and images
> using them? I might experiment here as well....
> 7) What else am I missing here? Anything that should be obvious?
>
> Wew....
>
> As you can see, I've got a lot of questions and a little cash burning a
hole
> in my pocket. I've held off for a few months now, and can wait a hair
> more, but I'm a bit on the edge now and ready to go. I THINK I like the
> Meade a bit better than the Celestron, but I've just read an article from
a
> guy who made the switch from Meade to Celestron and said he'd never go
> back, so now I've backed off a bit. It's just that Meade seems to give
> just a hair more for the buck.
>
> Oh, and that said, what's the experience with Tech support on these two
> manufacturers?
>
> Sorry so long, but I want to do this right and would appreciate any help
all
> you "amateur-experts" out there can give this "total-amateur"!
>
> Thanks in Advance


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A *real* observation report
    ... my Astronomik CLS filter (an acronym for "City Light Suppression," ... I'm sure it is a great scope, the dobs are easy to use. ... my open bedroom window. ... Since then, I've used my Dob as an observatory scope, although I ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Meade 12.5 inch Starfinder is still available
    ... While your are applauding Meade for keeping their Meade in the product line, ... the mirrors are good but the rest of the scope has some serious limitations. ... Buy an a GSO Dob or a Synta DOB and not only do you get a pretty decent mirror ... reasonable mount that just needs a bit of Ebony Star and Teflon to be a pretty ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: cas or dob for me
    ... I was thinking on a Meade ... Orion casgrain. ... Only you can decide which design of scope design is best for you, ... As for "to dob or not to dob"? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: cas or dob for me
    ... I was thinking on a Meade or ... Orion casgrain. ... Only you can decide which design of scope design is best for you, ... As for "to dob or not to dob"? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Get Me Started (again...)
    ... The only advantage of a schmidt corrector is to aid in particular optical problems inherent in extremely fast systems. ... If you want to put such a scope on an EQ mount for photography, you'll spend a lot of money. ... But that goes for any scope you want to use for photography, because the mountings that are good enough for photography cost a fortune. ... I'm looking at a Meade 6 or 8" Schmidt-Newtonian, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)

Loading