Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- From: Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:01:44 +0100
Brian Tung wrote:
Brian Murphy wrote:
I've read that here on SAA before and I question it. If the moons could be resolved naked eye, why wasn't it widely reported before Galileo?
Because they weren't expecting to see it. Galileo recorded Neptune in Jupiter's background. Several people recorded Uranus before its discovery. Even Herschel thought at first that he had discovered a comet. I suspect this is in large part because these folks expected there to be six planets, so that's how many there were.
I think something similar applies to Jupiter's satellites. No one before Galileo had ever suspected that Jupiter had satellites, and so no one ever mentioned any. Even if they had seen one, they would likely have just thought that it was a background star or an optical illusion.
I exepct they would just assume it was a background star. And most times it is. The bright planets get close to faint naked eye visible stars fairly often and they would have to spot that one of them was moving with Jupiter. Without accurate star maps this seems unlikely.
It does seem to the be case that is mostly childern that can see it, so there is also the possibility that they saw it and were not believed.
Your mention of the historical Chinese observational reference is interesting. Any references beyond the book?
Regards, Martin Brown .
- References:
- Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- From: Tom
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- From: Brian Tung
- Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- Prev by Date: Re: planet killed! saga of an atm'r (long)
- Next by Date: Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- Previous by thread: Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- Next by thread: Re: Epsilon Lyrae separation and optics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|